Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NEW BRAUNFELS REGIONAL REHABILITATIO 2026-04-26 15:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NEW BRAUNFELS REGIONAL REHABILITATIO
CCN 673049 | TX | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $2.1M → Pro Forma $3.1M (+$979K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$979K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$3.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$714K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$979K
Modeled Uplift
$719K
Risk-Adjusted
-$260K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$372K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$368K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$226K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$979K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$372K$372K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$358K$10K$368K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$57K$169K$226K$714K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$93K$186K$279K$372K$372K$372K$372K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$92K$184K$276K$368K$368K$368K$368K
A/R Days Reduction$0$75K$151K$226K$226K$226K$226K$226K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$267K$533K$794K$979K$979K$979K$979K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $979K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x54% / 8.7x58% / 10.0x62% / 11.3x64% / 11.9x66% / 12.6x
9.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.8x
10.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
11.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x
12.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.7x
Headroom (turns)
11%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 11% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.8x, adding 2.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.1M$2.1M11.3%
Year 1$2.2M+$653K$2.8M15.1%
Year 2$2.2M+$979K$3.2M17.2%
Year 3$2.3M+$979K$3.3M17.6%
Year 4$2.4M+$979K$3.3M17.9%
Year 5$2.4M+$979K$3.4M18.3%
$20.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$37.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$16.5M
Value Created
$3.4M
Exit EBITDA
$3.3M
Organic Growth
$9.8M
RCM Value Creation
$3.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$186K$279K$372K$447K
Denial Rate Reductio$184K$276K$368K$442K
A/R Days Reduction$113K$170K$226K$272K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$489K$734K$979K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 287 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin11.3%-23.7%-2.9%10.4%
P77
Net-to-Gross63.4%24.4%34.4%51.0%
P87
Occupancy80.9%19.3%44.2%69.4%
P86
Rev/Bed$465K$371K$584K$1.2M
P35
Exp/Bed$413K$402K$631K$1.3M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML