Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR INSTITUTE FOR REHABILITATION 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR INSTITUTE FOR REHABILITATION
CCN 673046 | TX | 44 beds | Current EBITDA $5.3M → Pro Forma $7.2M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$35.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$7.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$470K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$714K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$706K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$434K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$714K$714K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$687K$20K$706K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$109K$325K$434K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$178K$357K$535K$714K$714K$714K$714K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$177K$353K$530K$706K$706K$706K$706K
A/R Days Reduction$0$145K$289K$434K$434K$434K$434K$434K
Clean Claim Rate$0$11K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$511K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.3x61% / 10.9x63% / 11.5x
9.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.5x
11.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x
12.0x33% / 4.1x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
4%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 4% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.3M$5.3M14.9%
Year 1$5.5M+$1.3M$6.7M18.9%
Year 2$5.7M+$1.9M$7.5M21.1%
Year 3$5.8M+$1.9M$7.7M21.6%
Year 4$6.0M+$1.9M$7.9M22.1%
Year 5$6.2M+$1.9M$8.1M22.6%
$53.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$88.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$35.3M
Value Created
$8.1M
Exit EBITDA
$8.5M
Organic Growth
$18.8M
RCM Value Creation
$8.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$357K$535K$714K$856K
Denial Rate Reductio$353K$530K$706K$848K
A/R Days Reduction$217K$326K$434K$521K
Clean Claim Rate$11K$17K$23K$27K
Total$939K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 279 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin14.9%-20.8%-2.4%10.7%
P83
Net-to-Gross70.8%24.0%34.0%50.8%
P91
Occupancy93.0%20.9%45.6%71.3%
P97
Rev/Bed$811K$362K$568K$1.2M
P64
Exp/Bed$690K$393K$561K$1.3M
P55

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML