Bridge Realization Estimate
ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)
Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.7M modeled).
EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers
Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).
Lever Detail
Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.
| Lever | Current | Target | Revenue | Cost | EBITDA | WC | Ramp |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | 4.5% DEFAULT | 2.5% BENCHMARK | $0 | $636K | $636K | $0 | 12mo |
| Denial Rate Reduction | 12.0% DEFAULT | 6.5% BENCHMARK | $612K | $17K | $630K | $0 | 12mo |
| A/R Days Reduction | 52.00 DEFAULT | 38.00 BENCHMARK | $98K | $289K | $387K | $1.2M | 9mo |
| Clean Claim Rate | 88.0% DEFAULT | 96.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $20K | $20K | $0 | 6mo |
| Net Collection Rate | 93.5% DEFAULT | 49.7% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
| CDI / Case Mix Index | 135.0% DEFAULT | 142.0% BENCHMARK | $0 | $0 | $0 | $0 | 18mo |
Implementation Timing Curve
Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.
| Lever | M0 | M3 | M6 | M9 | M12 | M18 | M24 | M36 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $0 | $159K | $318K | $477K | $636K | $636K | $636K | $636K |
| Denial Rate Reduction | $0 | $157K | $315K | $472K | $630K | $630K | $630K | $630K |
| A/R Days Reduction | $0 | $129K | $258K | $387K | $387K | $387K | $387K | $387K |
| Clean Claim Rate | $0 | $10K | $20K | $20K | $20K | $20K | $20K | $20K |
| Cumulative | $0 | $456K | $911K | $1.4M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.7M | $1.7M |
Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)
5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.7M is added at exit.
| Entry \ Exit | 9.0x | 10.0x | 11.0x | 11.5x | 12.0x |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 8.0x | 58% / 9.7x | 62% / 11.2x | 66% / 12.6x | 68% / 13.3x | 70% / 14.1x |
| 9.0x | 53% / 8.3x | 57% / 9.6x | 61% / 10.8x | 63% / 11.5x | 65% / 12.1x |
| 10.0x | 48% / 7.1x | 53% / 8.3x | 57% / 9.4x | 59% / 10.0x | 60% / 10.6x |
| 11.0x | 44% / 6.2x | 49% / 7.2x | 53% / 8.3x | 55% / 8.8x | 56% / 9.3x |
| 12.0x | 40% / 5.4x | 45% / 6.4x | 49% / 7.3x | 51% / 7.8x | 53% / 8.3x |
Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)
Pro forma EBITDA can decline 19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.
5-Year Value Creation Waterfall
EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).
| Base EBITDA | RCM Uplift | Total | Margin | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Entry | $2.7M | — | $2.7M | 8.6% |
| Year 1 | $2.8M | +$1.1M | $3.9M | 12.3% |
| Year 2 | $2.9M | +$1.7M | $4.6M | 14.3% |
| Year 3 | $3.0M | +$1.7M | $4.6M | 14.6% |
| Year 4 | $3.1M | +$1.7M | $4.7M | 14.9% |
| Year 5 | $3.2M | +$1.7M | $4.8M | 15.2% |
Achievement Sensitivity
What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.
| Lever | 50% | 75% | 100% | 120% |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cost to Collect | $318K | $477K | $636K | $763K |
| Denial Rate Reductio | $315K | $472K | $630K | $756K |
| A/R Days Reduction | $193K | $290K | $387K | $464K |
| Clean Claim Rate | $10K | $15K | $20K | $24K |
| Total | $836K | $1.3M | $1.7M | $2.0M |
Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits
Key metrics vs 232 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.
| Metric | Hospital | P25 | P50 | P75 | Percentile |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Op Margin | 8.6% | -14.4% | 0.1% | 11.4% | P69 |
| Net-to-Gross | 61.1% | 19.4% | 30.6% | 49.7% | P84 |
| Occupancy | 85.8% | 33.2% | 56.1% | 72.4% | P90 |
| Rev/Bed | $530K | $318K | $544K | $1.1M | P49 |
| Exp/Bed | $485K | $327K | $492K | $1.1M | P49 |
Bridge Methodology
Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.