Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 06:49 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 673042 | TX | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $3.9M → Pro Forma $5.4M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$386K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$574K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$569K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$349K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$574K$574K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$553K$16K$569K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$88K$261K$349K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$144K$287K$431K$574K$574K$574K$574K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$142K$284K$426K$569K$569K$569K$569K
A/R Days Reduction$0$116K$233K$349K$349K$349K$349K$349K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$411K$823K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.4x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x64% / 11.9x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.8x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
12.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.9M$3.9M13.4%
Year 1$4.0M+$1.0M$5.0M17.3%
Year 2$4.1M+$1.5M$5.6M19.5%
Year 3$4.2M+$1.5M$5.7M19.9%
Year 4$4.3M+$1.5M$5.8M20.4%
Year 5$4.5M+$1.5M$6.0M20.8%
$38.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$65.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$27.2M
Value Created
$6.0M
Exit EBITDA
$6.1M
Organic Growth
$15.1M
RCM Value Creation
$6.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$287K$431K$574K$689K
Denial Rate Reductio$284K$426K$569K$682K
A/R Days Reduction$175K$262K$349K$419K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$755K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 276 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.4%-21.0%-3.2%10.7%
P79
Net-to-Gross67.3%23.0%32.9%51.0%
P88
Occupancy88.9%23.5%50.8%71.3%
P95
Rev/Bed$574K$335K$562K$1.1M
P51
Exp/Bed$497K$371K$537K$1.2M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML