Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 673032 | TX | 75 beds | Current EBITDA $6.4M → Pro Forma $8.6M (+$2.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$40.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$2.1M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$539K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$817K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$809K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$497K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$26K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$817K$817K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$787K$22K$809K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$125K$372K$497K$1.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$26K$26K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT46.4% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$204K$409K$613K$817K$817K$817K$817K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$202K$405K$607K$809K$809K$809K$809K
A/R Days Reduction$0$166K$331K$497K$497K$497K$497K$497K
Clean Claim Rate$0$13K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K$26K
Cumulative$0$585K$1.2M$1.7M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x57% / 9.7x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.4M$6.4M15.8%
Year 1$6.6M+$1.4M$8.1M19.7%
Year 2$6.8M+$2.1M$9.0M22.0%
Year 3$7.0M+$2.1M$9.2M22.5%
Year 4$7.2M+$2.1M$9.4M23.0%
Year 5$7.5M+$2.1M$9.6M23.5%
$64.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$105.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$41.4M
Value Created
$9.6M
Exit EBITDA
$10.3M
Organic Growth
$21.5M
RCM Value Creation
$9.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$409K$613K$817K$981K
Denial Rate Reductio$405K$607K$809K$971K
A/R Days Reduction$249K$373K$497K$597K
Clean Claim Rate$13K$20K$26K$31K
Total$1.1M$1.6M$2.1M$2.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 217 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.8%-11.8%1.5%11.7%
P82
Net-to-Gross64.6%17.5%30.3%46.4%
P88
Occupancy90.9%38.9%57.4%75.2%
P97
Rev/Bed$545K$293K$548K$1.1M
P50
Exp/Bed$459K$308K$494K$1.1M
P43

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML