Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — METHODIST REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:30 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — METHODIST REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 673031 | TX | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $10.5M → Pro Forma $12.1M (+$1.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$30.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$1.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$442K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.1M (vs $1.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$602K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$596K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$366K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$602K$602K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$579K$17K$596K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$92K$274K$366K$1.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$150K$301K$451K$602K$602K$602K$602K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$149K$298K$447K$596K$596K$596K$596K
A/R Days Reduction$0$122K$244K$366K$366K$366K$366K$366K
Clean Claim Rate$0$10K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$431K$862K$1.3M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
9.0x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x
10.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.0x
12.0x26% / 3.1x31% / 3.9x35% / 4.6x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.9x
Headroom (turns)
-13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.4x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.5M$10.5M35.0%
Year 1$10.8M+$1.1M$11.9M39.5%
Year 2$11.2M+$1.6M$12.7M42.4%
Year 3$11.5M+$1.6M$13.1M43.5%
Year 4$11.8M+$1.6M$13.4M44.6%
Year 5$12.2M+$1.6M$13.8M45.8%
$105.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$151.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$46.4M
Value Created
$13.8M
Exit EBITDA
$16.8M
Organic Growth
$15.8M
RCM Value Creation
$13.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$301K$451K$602K$722K
Denial Rate Reductio$298K$447K$596K$715K
A/R Days Reduction$183K$275K$366K$439K
Clean Claim Rate$10K$14K$19K$23K
Total$792K$1.2M$1.6M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 276 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin35.0%-21.0%-3.2%10.7%
P98
Net-to-Gross89.0%23.0%32.9%51.0%
P97
Occupancy83.5%23.5%50.8%71.3%
P88
Rev/Bed$602K$335K$562K$1.1M
P53
Exp/Bed$391K$371K$537K$1.2M
P27

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML