Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP 2026-04-26 14:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ENCOMPASS HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSP
CCN 673029 | TX | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $4.7M → Pro Forma $6.2M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$29.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$4.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$1.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$365K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.2M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$589K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$583K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$358K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$19K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$589K$589K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$566K$16K$583K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$90K$268K$358K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$19K$19K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$147K$294K$441K$589K$589K$589K$589K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$146K$291K$437K$583K$583K$583K$583K
A/R Days Reduction$0$119K$239K$358K$358K$358K$358K$358K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K$19K
Cumulative$0$422K$843K$1.3M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
9.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x
10.0x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
12.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
2%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 2% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$4.7M$4.7M15.9%
Year 1$4.8M+$1.0M$5.8M19.9%
Year 2$5.0M+$1.5M$6.5M22.1%
Year 3$5.1M+$1.5M$6.7M22.6%
Year 4$5.3M+$1.5M$6.8M23.1%
Year 5$5.4M+$1.5M$7.0M23.7%
$46.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$76.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$29.9M
Value Created
$7.0M
Exit EBITDA
$7.4M
Organic Growth
$15.5M
RCM Value Creation
$7.0M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$294K$441K$589K$706K
Denial Rate Reductio$291K$437K$583K$699K
A/R Days Reduction$179K$269K$358K$430K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$19K$23K
Total$774K$1.2M$1.5M$1.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 276 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.9%-21.0%-3.2%10.7%
P85
Net-to-Gross65.1%23.0%32.9%51.0%
P88
Occupancy94.6%23.5%50.8%71.3%
P99
Rev/Bed$589K$335K$562K$1.1M
P52
Exp/Bed$495K$371K$537K$1.2M
P45

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML