Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — METHODIST MIDLOTHIAN MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 15:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — METHODIST MIDLOTHIAN MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 670300 | TX | 46 beds | Current EBITDA $1.9M → Pro Forma $5.5M (+$3.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$69.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$1.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$3.6M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$843K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$44K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.4M$1.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$38K$1.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$213K$630K$843K$2.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$44K$44K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT50.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$346K$693K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$343K$686K$1.0M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$281K$562K$843K$843K$843K$843K$843K
Clean Claim Rate$0$22K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K$44K
Cumulative$0$993K$2.0M$3.0M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M$3.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x81% / 19.4x85% / 21.9x89% / 24.4x91% / 25.6x93% / 26.9x
9.0x76% / 16.9x80% / 19.1x84% / 21.3x86% / 22.4x88% / 23.6x
10.0x72% / 14.8x76% / 16.9x80% / 18.9x82% / 19.9x84% / 20.9x
11.0x68% / 13.2x72% / 15.0x76% / 16.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.7x
12.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.6x
Headroom (turns)
56%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 56% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.9x, adding 5.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$1.9M$1.9M2.7%
Year 1$1.9M+$2.4M$4.4M6.3%
Year 2$2.0M+$3.6M$5.6M8.1%
Year 3$2.1M+$3.6M$5.7M8.2%
Year 4$2.1M+$3.6M$5.8M8.3%
Year 5$2.2M+$3.6M$5.8M8.4%
$18.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$64.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$45.3M
Value Created
$5.8M
Exit EBITDA
$3.0M
Organic Growth
$36.5M
RCM Value Creation
$5.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$693K$1.0M$1.4M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$686K$1.0M$1.4M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$422K$632K$843K$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$22K$33K$44K$53K
Total$1.8M$2.7M$3.6M$4.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 284 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.7%-21.0%-2.4%10.6%
P58
Net-to-Gross25.1%24.1%34.0%50.6%
P29
Occupancy39.7%22.0%46.8%71.8%
P43
Rev/Bed$1.5M$343K$562K$1.2M
P85
Exp/Bed$1.5M$390K$554K$1.3M
P83

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML