Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — KINGWOOD EMERGENCY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 06:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — KINGWOOD EMERGENCY HOSPITAL
CCN 670285 | TX | 6 beds | Current EBITDA $5.5M → Pro Forma $6.6M (+$1.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$20.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$771K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$1.1M
Modeled Uplift
$646K
Risk-Adjusted
-$411K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.6M (vs $1.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$402K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$398K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$245K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$13K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$402K$402K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$387K$11K$398K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$62K$183K$245K$771K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$13K$13K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT71.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$100K$201K$301K$402K$402K$402K$402K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$99K$199K$298K$398K$398K$398K$398K
A/R Days Reduction$0$82K$163K$245K$245K$245K$245K$245K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K$13K
Cumulative$0$288K$576K$857K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.6x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.4x58% / 9.9x
9.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.5x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x
11.0x32% / 3.9x37% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x
12.0x27% / 3.3x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.6x
Headroom (turns)
-9%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -9% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.1x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.5M$5.5M27.3%
Year 1$5.7M+$705K$6.4M31.7%
Year 2$5.8M+$1.1M$6.9M34.3%
Year 3$6.0M+$1.1M$7.1M35.1%
Year 4$6.2M+$1.1M$7.2M36.0%
Year 5$6.4M+$1.1M$7.4M37.0%
$54.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$81.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$26.7M
Value Created
$7.4M
Exit EBITDA
$8.7M
Organic Growth
$10.6M
RCM Value Creation
$7.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$201K$301K$402K$482K
Denial Rate Reductio$199K$298K$398K$477K
A/R Days Reduction$122K$183K$245K$293K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$10K$13K$15K
Total$529K$793K$1.1M$1.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 8 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin27.3%-49.5%-44.0%-24.3%
P100
Net-to-Gross99.9%19.4%31.1%58.0%
P100
Occupancy16.9%12.9%16.3%21.0%
P50
Rev/Bed$3.3M$709K$838K$2.2M
P75
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.2M$1.4M$2.7M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML