Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CAPROCK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CAPROCK HOSPITAL
CCN 670259 | TX | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $157K → Pro Forma $276K (+$119K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$2.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$157K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$119K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$276K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+605bps
Margin Improvement
$75K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$119K
Modeled Uplift
$69K
Risk-Adjusted
-$49K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.1M (vs $0.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$46K
+235bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$39K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$24K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+49bp
Total EBITDA Impact$119K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$38K$8K$46K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$6K$18K$24K$75K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$12K$23K$35K$46K$46K$46K$46K
Cost to Collect$0$10K$20K$29K$39K$39K$39K$39K
A/R Days Reduction$0$8K$16K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$34K$68K$97K$119K$119K$119K$119K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $119K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x61% / 10.8x65% / 12.3x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x73% / 15.4x
9.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x
10.0x51% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.7x
11.0x47% / 6.9x52% / 8.1x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.3x
12.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.8x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.7x
Headroom (turns)
26%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 26% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.8x, adding 3.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$157K$157K8.0%
Year 1$162K+$79K$241K12.3%
Year 2$166K+$119K$285K14.5%
Year 3$171K+$119K$290K14.8%
Year 4$177K+$119K$295K15.1%
Year 5$182K+$119K$301K15.3%
$1.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$3.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$1.7M
Value Created
$301K
Exit EBITDA
$250K
Organic Growth
$1.2M
RCM Value Creation
$301K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$23K$35K$46K$55K
Cost to Collect$20K$29K$39K$47K
A/R Days Reduction$12K$18K$24K$29K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$59K$89K$119K$142K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 65 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-49.5%-29.7%6.5%
P0
Net-to-Gross7.1%22.8%43.4%64.7%
P2
Occupancy9.9%10.8%18.7%29.7%
P23
Rev/Bed$196K$482K$821K$1.8M
P3
Exp/Bed$1.3M$695K$1.1M$2.0M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML