Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ALTUS HOUSTON HOSPITAL LP 2026-04-26 14:13 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ALTUS HOUSTON HOSPITAL LP
CCN 670135 | TX | 10 beds | Current EBITDA $-8.4M → Pro Forma $-7.4M (+$963K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$18.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-8.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$963K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-7.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$702K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$963K
Modeled Uplift
$713K
Risk-Adjusted
-$249K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.7M (vs $1.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$366K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$362K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$223K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$12K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$963K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$366K$366K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$352K$10K$362K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$56K$167K$223K$702K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$12K$12K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT64.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$91K$183K$274K$366K$366K$366K$366K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$91K$181K$272K$362K$362K$362K$362K
A/R Days Reduction$0$74K$148K$223K$223K$223K$223K$223K
Clean Claim Rate$0$6K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K$12K
Cumulative$0$262K$524K$781K$963K$963K$963K$963K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $963K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-8.4M$-8.4M-45.7%
Year 1$-8.6M+$642K$-8.0M-43.5%
Year 2$-8.9M+$963K$-7.9M-43.2%
Year 3$-9.1M+$963K$-8.2M-44.6%
Year 4$-9.4M+$963K$-8.4M-46.1%
Year 5$-9.7M+$963K$-8.7M-47.7%
$-83.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$-96.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$-12.4M
Value Created
$-8.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-13.3M
Organic Growth
$9.6M
RCM Value Creation
$-8.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$183K$274K$366K$439K
Denial Rate Reductio$181K$272K$362K$435K
A/R Days Reduction$111K$167K$223K$267K
Clean Claim Rate$6K$9K$12K$14K
Total$481K$722K$963K$1.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 65 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-45.7%-49.5%-29.7%6.5%
P30
Net-to-Gross7.2%22.8%43.4%64.7%
P3
Occupancy75.0%10.8%18.7%29.7%
P97
Rev/Bed$1.8M$482K$821K$1.8M
P73
Exp/Bed$2.7M$695K$1.1M$2.0M
P80

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML