Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS CENTER FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASE 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — TEXAS CENTER FOR INFECTIOUS DISEASE
CCN 670125 | TX | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $5.8M → Pro Forma $6.6M (+$754K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$14.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$754K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+527bps
Margin Improvement
$549K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$754K
Modeled Uplift
$490K
Risk-Adjusted
-$264K
Execution Discount
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Payer Diversity, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Net-to-Gross Ratio, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.5M (vs $0.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$286K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$284K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$174K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+7bp
Total EBITDA Impact$754K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$286K$286K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$276K$8K$284K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$44K$130K$174K$549K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$72K$143K$215K$286K$286K$286K$286K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$71K$142K$213K$284K$284K$284K$284K
A/R Days Reduction$0$58K$116K$174K$174K$174K$174K$174K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$205K$411K$612K$754K$754K$754K$754K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $754K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
9.0x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.1x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.8M$5.8M40.8%
Year 1$6.0M+$503K$6.5M45.6%
Year 2$6.2M+$754K$7.0M48.6%
Year 3$6.4M+$754K$7.1M49.9%
Year 4$6.6M+$754K$7.3M51.2%
Year 5$6.8M+$754K$7.5M52.6%
$58.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$82.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.4M
Value Created
$7.5M
Exit EBITDA
$9.3M
Organic Growth
$7.5M
RCM Value Creation
$7.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$143K$215K$286K$344K
Denial Rate Reductio$142K$213K$284K$341K
A/R Days Reduction$87K$131K$174K$209K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$377K$566K$754K$905K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 276 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin40.8%-21.0%-3.2%10.7%
P99
Net-to-Gross100.0%23.0%32.9%51.0%
P98
Occupancy56.3%23.5%50.8%71.3%
P58
Rev/Bed$286K$335K$562K$1.1M
P19
Exp/Bed$170K$371K$537K$1.2M
P4

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML