Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE HOSPITALS OF PROV HORIZON CITY 2026-04-26 13:00 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE HOSPITALS OF PROV HORIZON CITY
CCN 670124 | TX | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $10.5M → Pro Forma $13.2M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$51.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$10.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$13.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$907K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.8M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$626K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$33K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$990K$28K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$158K$468K$626K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$33K$33K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$257K$514K$772K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$255K$509K$764K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$209K$417K$626K$626K$626K$626K$626K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K
Cumulative$0$737K$1.5M$2.2M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x48% / 7.1x53% / 8.3x57% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x
9.0x43% / 6.0x48% / 7.0x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x
10.0x38% / 5.0x43% / 6.0x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x
11.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.1x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
12.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.2x
Headroom (turns)
-3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.7x, adding 1.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$10.5M$10.5M20.3%
Year 1$10.8M+$1.8M$12.6M24.4%
Year 2$11.1M+$2.7M$13.8M26.8%
Year 3$11.4M+$2.7M$14.1M27.5%
Year 4$11.8M+$2.7M$14.5M28.1%
Year 5$12.1M+$2.7M$14.8M28.8%
$104.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$163.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$58.6M
Value Created
$14.8M
Exit EBITDA
$16.7M
Organic Growth
$27.1M
RCM Value Creation
$14.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$514K$772K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$509K$764K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$313K$469K$626K$751K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$25K$33K$40K
Total$1.4M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 172 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin20.3%-46.0%-16.8%8.7%
P89
Net-to-Gross9.0%25.8%39.5%56.2%
P2
Occupancy29.3%12.3%23.2%45.6%
P60
Rev/Bed$3.2M$454K$733K$1.4M
P87
Exp/Bed$2.6M$588K$1.0M$1.6M
P84

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML