Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HOUSTON METHODIST THE WOODLANDS 2026-04-26 04:01 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HOUSTON METHODIST THE WOODLANDS
CCN 670122 | TX | 292 beds | Current EBITDA $74.4M → Pro Forma $102.6M (+$28.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$535.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$74.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$28.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$102.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$28.2M
Modeled Uplift
$19.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.9M (vs $28.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$343K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$28.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.7M$10.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.3M$295K$10.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.9M$6.5M$20.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$343K$343K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.7M$5.4M$8.0M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M$10.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.7M$5.3M$8.0M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.2M$4.3M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$171K$343K$343K$343K$343K$343K$343K
Cumulative$0$7.7M$15.4M$22.9M$28.2M$28.2M$28.2M$28.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $28.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x52% / 8.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x64% / 11.8x
9.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
10.0x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x
11.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x
12.0x34% / 4.2x38% / 5.1x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.4x
Headroom (turns)
6%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 6% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.1x, adding 2.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$74.4M$74.4M13.9%
Year 1$76.7M+$18.8M$95.5M17.8%
Year 2$79.0M+$28.2M$107.2M20.0%
Year 3$81.3M+$28.2M$109.5M20.4%
Year 4$83.8M+$28.2M$112.0M20.9%
Year 5$86.3M+$28.2M$114.5M21.4%
$744.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.26B
Exit EV (11x)
$515.0M
Value Created
$114.5M
Exit EBITDA
$118.6M
Organic Growth
$282.0M
RCM Value Creation
$114.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.4M$8.0M$10.7M$12.9M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.3M$8.0M$10.6M$12.7M
A/R Days Reduction$3.3M$4.9M$6.5M$7.8M
Clean Claim Rate$171K$257K$343K$412K
Total$14.1M$21.1M$28.2M$33.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 132 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin13.9%-7.8%4.7%14.9%
P73
Net-to-Gross17.1%12.6%18.1%25.2%
P43
Occupancy68.8%55.3%67.3%75.7%
P53
Rev/Bed$1.8M$814K$1.3M$1.5M
P87
Exp/Bed$1.6M$761K$1.1M$1.5M
P80

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML