Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CLEVELAND EMERGENCY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CLEVELAND EMERGENCY HOSPITAL
CCN 670115 | TX | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $6.9M → Pro Forma $10.4M (+$3.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$66.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$6.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$10.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$3.5M
Modeled Uplift
$2.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.3M (vs $3.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$814K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$43K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$37K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$205K$609K$814K$2.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$43K$43K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT56.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$335K$669K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$331K$662K$994K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$271K$543K$814K$814K$814K$814K$814K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K
Cumulative$0$959K$1.9M$2.9M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.3x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
9.0x50% / 7.6x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.0x60% / 10.6x62% / 11.2x
10.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$6.9M$6.9M10.2%
Year 1$7.1M+$2.3M$9.4M14.1%
Year 2$7.3M+$3.5M$10.8M16.1%
Year 3$7.5M+$3.5M$11.0M16.5%
Year 4$7.7M+$3.5M$11.2M16.8%
Year 5$7.9M+$3.5M$11.5M17.1%
$68.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$126.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$57.6M
Value Created
$11.5M
Exit EBITDA
$10.9M
Organic Growth
$35.2M
RCM Value Creation
$11.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$669K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$662K$994K$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$407K$611K$814K$977K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$32K$43K$51K
Total$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 172 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.2%-46.0%-16.8%8.7%
P78
Net-to-Gross5.6%25.8%39.5%56.2%
P0
Occupancy14.7%12.3%23.2%45.6%
P33
Rev/Bed$4.2M$454K$733K$1.4M
P92
Exp/Bed$3.8M$588K$1.0M$1.6M
P95

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML