Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — CUMBERLAND SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 14:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — CUMBERLAND SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 670112 | TX | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-15.8M → Pro Forma $-11.8M (+$4.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$76.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-15.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-11.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$4.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.6M (vs $4.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$927K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$49K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$42K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$234K$693K$927K$2.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$49K$49K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$381K$762K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$377K$754K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$309K$618K$927K$927K$927K$927K$927K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$49K$49K$49K$49K$49K$49K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.3M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-15.8M$-15.8M-20.8%
Year 1$-16.3M+$2.7M$-13.6M-17.9%
Year 2$-16.8M+$4.0M$-12.8M-16.8%
Year 3$-17.3M+$4.0M$-13.3M-17.5%
Year 4$-17.8M+$4.0M$-13.8M-18.1%
Year 5$-18.4M+$4.0M$-14.4M-18.8%
$-158.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$-157.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$493K
Value Created
$-14.4M
Exit EBITDA
$-25.2M
Organic Growth
$40.1M
RCM Value Creation
$-14.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$762K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$754K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$464K$695K$927K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$37K$49K$59K
Total$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 257 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.8%-36.7%-7.9%9.6%
P35
Net-to-Gross17.4%25.0%36.3%53.9%
P9
Occupancy20.0%13.2%30.0%56.2%
P36
Rev/Bed$3.0M$436K$654K$1.3M
P90
Exp/Bed$3.7M$458K$834K$1.4M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML