Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — METHODIST WEST HOUSTON HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 03:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — METHODIST WEST HOUSTON HOSPITAL
CCN 670077 | TX | 270 beds | Current EBITDA $81.9M → Pro Forma $109.8M (+$27.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$529.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$81.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$27.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$109.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$20.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$27.9M
Modeled Uplift
$19.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.6M (vs $27.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$10.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$10.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$6.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$339K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$27.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$10.6M$10.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$10.2M$291K$10.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.6M$4.8M$6.4M$20.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$339K$339K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT25.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.6M$5.3M$7.9M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M$10.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.6M$5.2M$7.9M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.1M$4.3M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$169K$339K$339K$339K$339K$339K$339K
Cumulative$0$7.6M$15.2M$22.6M$27.9M$27.9M$27.9M$27.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $27.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
9.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
10.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x51% / 8.0x53% / 8.4x
11.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
12.0x32% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.2x
Headroom (turns)
3%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 3% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.3x, adding 2.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$81.9M$81.9M15.5%
Year 1$84.4M+$18.6M$103.0M19.4%
Year 2$86.9M+$27.9M$114.8M21.7%
Year 3$89.5M+$27.9M$117.4M22.2%
Year 4$92.2M+$27.9M$120.1M22.7%
Year 5$95.0M+$27.9M$122.8M23.2%
$819.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.35B
Exit EV (11x)
$532.0M
Value Created
$122.8M
Exit EBITDA
$130.5M
Organic Growth
$278.7M
RCM Value Creation
$122.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$5.3M$7.9M$10.6M$12.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$5.2M$7.9M$10.5M$12.6M
A/R Days Reduction$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M
Clean Claim Rate$169K$254K$339K$407K
Total$13.9M$20.9M$27.9M$33.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 134 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin15.5%-7.9%4.7%14.7%
P75
Net-to-Gross18.1%12.7%18.1%25.2%
P50
Occupancy66.5%54.6%66.7%75.6%
P48
Rev/Bed$2.0M$721K$1.2M$1.5M
P91
Exp/Bed$1.7M$722K$1.1M$1.5M
P81

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML