Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — METHODIST MCKINNEY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 17:21 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — METHODIST MCKINNEY HOSPITAL
CCN 670069 | TX | 23 beds | Current EBITDA $8.0M → Pro Forma $12.0M (+$4.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$76.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$12.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

63%
Realization (C)
$4.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 63% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.5M (vs $4.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$925K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$49K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.5M$42K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$233K$692K$925K$2.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$49K$49K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$380K$760K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$376K$753K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$308K$617K$925K$925K$925K$925K$925K
Clean Claim Rate$0$24K$49K$49K$49K$49K$49K$49K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.2M$3.2M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x67% / 12.9x
9.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
10.0x45% / 6.5x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.7x
11.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x54% / 8.5x
12.0x37% / 4.8x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.8 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.0M$8.0M10.5%
Year 1$8.2M+$2.7M$10.9M14.3%
Year 2$8.5M+$4.0M$12.5M16.4%
Year 3$8.7M+$4.0M$12.7M16.7%
Year 4$9.0M+$4.0M$13.0M17.1%
Year 5$9.3M+$4.0M$13.3M17.4%
$79.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$145.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$66.0M
Value Created
$13.3M
Exit EBITDA
$12.7M
Organic Growth
$40.0M
RCM Value Creation
$13.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$760K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$753K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
A/R Days Reduction$463K$694K$925K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$24K$36K$49K$58K
Total$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 236 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.5%-37.9%-8.6%8.9%
P77
Net-to-Gross36.6%25.1%36.9%53.9%
P49
Occupancy13.8%12.7%27.9%53.8%
P27
Rev/Bed$3.3M$438K$656K$1.3M
P91
Exp/Bed$3.0M$464K$876K$1.4M
P92

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML