Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR ORTHOPEDIC AND SPINE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 10:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR ORTHOPEDIC AND SPINE HOSPITAL
CCN 670067 | TX | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $53.3M → Pro Forma $60.3M (+$7.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$133.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$53.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$60.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$7.0M
Modeled Uplift
$4.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.2M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.8M (vs $7.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$86K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.7M$2.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.6M$74K$2.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$410K$1.2M$1.6M$5.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$86K$86K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$669K$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$662K$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$543K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$43K$86K$86K$86K$86K$86K$86K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.2x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.3x55% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
9.0x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x48% / 7.0x50% / 7.5x51% / 7.9x
10.0x34% / 4.3x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x47% / 6.8x
11.0x29% / 3.6x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x
12.0x25% / 3.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.8x39% / 5.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
-1.0x
Headroom (turns)
-15%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -15% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.5x, adding 1.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$53.3M$53.3M39.8%
Year 1$54.9M+$4.7M$59.6M44.5%
Year 2$56.5M+$7.0M$63.6M47.5%
Year 3$58.2M+$7.0M$65.3M48.8%
Year 4$60.0M+$7.0M$67.0M50.1%
Year 5$61.8M+$7.0M$68.8M51.4%
$532.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$756.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$224.1M
Value Created
$68.8M
Exit EBITDA
$84.9M
Organic Growth
$70.4M
RCM Value Creation
$68.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$814K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$43K$64K$86K$103K
Total$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$8.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 247 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin39.8%-37.7%-8.4%9.0%
P99
Net-to-Gross34.7%25.1%36.5%53.8%
P46
Occupancy25.2%13.1%29.3%55.0%
P45
Rev/Bed$5.6M$432K$659K$1.3M
P97
Exp/Bed$3.4M$459K$877K$1.4M
P94

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML