Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 14:08 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BAYLOR EMERGENCY MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 670062 | TX | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $8.6M → Pro Forma $11.2M (+$2.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$49.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

58%
Realization (C)
$2.6M
Modeled Uplift
$1.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 58% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.5M (vs $2.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$993K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$983K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$604K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$32K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$993K$993K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$955K$27K$983K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$152K$452K$604K$1.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$32K$32K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$248K$496K$744K$993K$993K$993K$993K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$246K$491K$737K$983K$983K$983K$983K
A/R Days Reduction$0$201K$403K$604K$604K$604K$604K$604K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K$32K
Cumulative$0$711K$1.4M$2.1M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M$2.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.6M$8.6M17.2%
Year 1$8.8M+$1.7M$10.6M21.3%
Year 2$9.1M+$2.6M$11.7M23.5%
Year 3$9.3M+$2.6M$12.0M24.1%
Year 4$9.6M+$2.6M$12.2M24.7%
Year 5$9.9M+$2.6M$12.5M25.2%
$85.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$137.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$52.3M
Value Created
$12.5M
Exit EBITDA
$13.6M
Organic Growth
$26.1M
RCM Value Creation
$12.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$496K$744K$993K$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$491K$737K$983K$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$302K$453K$604K$725K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$32K$38K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.6M$3.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 287 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.2%-23.7%-2.9%10.4%
P86
Net-to-Gross27.3%24.4%34.4%51.0%
P34
Occupancy5.8%19.3%44.2%69.4%
P4
Rev/Bed$1.2M$371K$584K$1.2M
P77
Exp/Bed$1.0M$402K$631K$1.3M
P66

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML