Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES LAKESIDE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:50 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. LUKES LAKESIDE HOSPITAL
CCN 670059 | TX | 30 beds | Current EBITDA $8.8M → Pro Forma $11.5M (+$2.7M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$50.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.7M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$11.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

61%
Realization (C)
$2.7M
Modeled Uplift
$1.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 61% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.6M (vs $2.7M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$619K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$33K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.7M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.0M$1.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$979K$28K$1.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$156K$463K$619K$2.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$33K$33K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$254K$509K$763K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$252K$504K$755K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$206K$413K$619K$619K$619K$619K$619K
Clean Claim Rate$0$16K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K$33K
Cumulative$0$729K$1.5M$2.2M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.7M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.4x54% / 8.6x58% / 9.8x60% / 10.4x62% / 11.0x
9.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x40% / 5.5x42% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.8M$8.8M17.4%
Year 1$9.1M+$1.8M$10.9M21.4%
Year 2$9.4M+$2.7M$12.0M23.7%
Year 3$9.7M+$2.7M$12.3M24.2%
Year 4$9.9M+$2.7M$12.6M24.8%
Year 5$10.2M+$2.7M$12.9M25.4%
$88.3M
Entry EV (10x)
$142.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$53.7M
Value Created
$12.9M
Exit EBITDA
$14.1M
Organic Growth
$26.8M
RCM Value Creation
$12.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$509K$763K$1.0M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$504K$755K$1.0M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$309K$464K$619K$743K
Clean Claim Rate$16K$24K$33K$39K
Total$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 278 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.4%-30.6%-4.0%10.0%
P87
Net-to-Gross18.3%24.4%35.3%51.9%
P13
Occupancy12.0%15.4%33.8%60.4%
P18
Rev/Bed$1.7M$421K$624K$1.2M
P85
Exp/Bed$1.4M$437K$790K$1.4M
P76

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML