Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SETON HAYS 2026-04-26 09:54 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SETON HAYS
CCN 670056 | TX | 158 beds | Current EBITDA $5.2M → Pro Forma $17.3M (+$12.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$231.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$12.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$17.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$8.9M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$12.2M
Modeled Uplift
$8.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.4M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $8.7M (vs $12.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.6M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.8M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$148K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$12.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.6M$4.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$4.4M$127K$4.6M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$709K$2.1M$2.8M$8.9M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$148K$148K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT31.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.2M$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.1M$2.3M$3.4M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
A/R Days Reduction$0$937K$1.9M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
Clean Claim Rate$0$74K$148K$148K$148K$148K$148K$148K
Cumulative$0$3.3M$6.6M$9.9M$12.2M$12.2M$12.2M$12.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $12.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x86% / 22.4x91% / 25.2x95% / 28.0x97% / 29.5x99% / 30.9x
9.0x81% / 19.5x86% / 22.0x90% / 24.6x92% / 25.8x93% / 27.1x
10.0x77% / 17.2x81% / 19.5x85% / 21.8x87% / 22.9x89% / 24.1x
11.0x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.4x81% / 19.5x83% / 20.5x85% / 21.6x
12.0x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.7x77% / 17.6x79% / 18.6x81% / 19.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.0x
Headroom (turns)
61%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 61% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.5x, adding 5.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.2M$5.2M2.2%
Year 1$5.3M+$8.1M$13.5M5.8%
Year 2$5.5M+$12.2M$17.7M7.6%
Year 3$5.7M+$12.2M$17.8M7.7%
Year 4$5.8M+$12.2M$18.0M7.8%
Year 5$6.0M+$12.2M$18.2M7.9%
$51.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$199.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$148.0M
Value Created
$18.2M
Exit EBITDA
$8.3M
Organic Growth
$121.6M
RCM Value Creation
$18.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$5.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.3M$3.4M$4.6M$5.5M
A/R Days Reduction$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
Clean Claim Rate$74K$111K$148K$177K
Total$6.1M$9.1M$12.2M$14.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 165 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.2%-8.4%2.8%14.2%
P48
Net-to-Gross13.8%14.1%21.3%31.2%
P24
Occupancy72.7%48.4%63.6%73.9%
P72
Rev/Bed$1.5M$357K$1.0M$1.5M
P75
Exp/Bed$1.4M$393K$952K$1.3M
P79

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML