Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — METHODIST STONE OAK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:34 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — METHODIST STONE OAK HOSPITAL
CCN 670055 | TX | 253 beds | Current EBITDA $88.6M → Pro Forma $107.1M (+$18.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$352.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$88.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$18.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$107.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$13.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

74%
Realization (B)
$18.5M
Modeled Uplift
$13.6M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 74% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $13.6M (vs $18.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$225K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$18.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.0M$7.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.8M$194K$7.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.1M$3.2M$4.3M$13.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$225K$225K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT26.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.7M$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M$7.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.4M$2.9M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M$4.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$113K$225K$225K$225K$225K$225K$225K
Cumulative$0$5.0M$10.1M$15.0M$18.5M$18.5M$18.5M$18.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $18.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 7.9x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.5x48% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.7x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.5x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$88.6M$88.6M25.2%
Year 1$91.3M+$12.4M$103.6M29.4%
Year 2$94.0M+$18.5M$112.5M32.0%
Year 3$96.8M+$18.5M$115.4M32.8%
Year 4$99.7M+$18.5M$118.3M33.6%
Year 5$102.7M+$18.5M$121.3M34.4%
$886.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.33B
Exit EV (11x)
$447.7M
Value Created
$121.3M
Exit EBITDA
$141.1M
Organic Growth
$185.3M
RCM Value Creation
$121.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.5M$5.3M$7.0M$8.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.5M$5.2M$7.0M$8.4M
A/R Days Reduction$2.1M$3.2M$4.3M$5.1M
Clean Claim Rate$113K$169K$225K$271K
Total$9.3M$13.9M$18.5M$22.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 135 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.2%-7.3%4.9%14.3%
P90
Net-to-Gross14.5%13.3%18.6%26.0%
P30
Occupancy85.3%53.2%66.6%75.7%
P90
Rev/Bed$1.4M$670K$1.2M$1.5M
P66
Exp/Bed$1.0M$693K$1.1M$1.5M
P46

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML