Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — FOUNDATION SURGICAL OF SAN ANTONIO 2026-04-26 15:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — FOUNDATION SURGICAL OF SAN ANTONIO
CCN 670054 | TX | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $771K → Pro Forma $2.8M (+$2.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$38.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$771K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$2.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$2.0M
Modeled Uplift
$1.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$716K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Payer DiversityHigher Payer Diversity increases execution likelih

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.3M (vs $2.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$762K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$755K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$464K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$24K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$2.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$762K$762K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$734K$21K$755K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$117K$347K$464K$1.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$24K$24K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$191K$381K$572K$762K$762K$762K$762K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$189K$377K$566K$755K$755K$755K$755K
A/R Days Reduction$0$155K$309K$464K$464K$464K$464K$464K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K$24K
Cumulative$0$546K$1.1M$1.6M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $2.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x89% / 24.2x94% / 27.3x98% / 30.4x100% / 31.9x102% / 33.4x
9.0x84% / 21.2x89% / 23.9x93% / 26.6x95% / 28.0x97% / 29.3x
10.0x80% / 18.8x84% / 21.2x88% / 23.6x90% / 24.9x92% / 26.1x
11.0x76% / 16.8x80% / 19.0x84% / 21.2x86% / 22.3x88% / 23.4x
12.0x72% / 15.1x76% / 17.1x80% / 19.2x82% / 20.2x84% / 21.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
2.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
4.2x
Headroom (turns)
64%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 64% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 2.3x, adding 6.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$771K$771K2.0%
Year 1$794K+$1.3M$2.1M5.6%
Year 2$818K+$2.0M$2.8M7.4%
Year 3$842K+$2.0M$2.8M7.5%
Year 4$868K+$2.0M$2.9M7.5%
Year 5$894K+$2.0M$2.9M7.6%
$7.7M
Entry EV (10x)
$31.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$24.2M
Value Created
$2.9M
Exit EBITDA
$1.2M
Organic Growth
$20.1M
RCM Value Creation
$2.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$381K$572K$762K$915K
Denial Rate Reductio$377K$566K$755K$906K
A/R Days Reduction$232K$348K$464K$557K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$18K$24K$29K
Total$1.0M$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 221 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin2.0%-41.9%-12.0%8.9%
P65
Net-to-Gross14.1%25.6%37.9%54.2%
P5
Occupancy28.8%12.5%25.4%52.2%
P54
Rev/Bed$1.9M$439K$670K$1.3M
P86
Exp/Bed$1.9M$500K$913K$1.4M
P82

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML