Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — NORTH CENTRAL SURGICAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 09:07 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — NORTH CENTRAL SURGICAL HOSPITAL
CCN 670049 | TX | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $46.0M → Pro Forma $53.6M (+$7.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$143.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$46.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$53.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (C)
$7.6M
Modeled Uplift
$5.3M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.3M (vs $7.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.8M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$92K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.9M$2.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.8M$79K$2.8M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$441K$1.3M$1.7M$5.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$92K$92K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$718K$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M$2.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$711K$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M$2.8M
A/R Days Reduction$0$583K$1.2M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$46K$92K$92K$92K$92K$92K$92K
Cumulative$0$2.1M$4.1M$6.1M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M$7.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.6x56% / 9.1x57% / 9.7x
9.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.1x
11.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.4x42% / 5.8x44% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$46.0M$46.0M32.0%
Year 1$47.4M+$5.0M$52.4M36.5%
Year 2$48.8M+$7.6M$56.4M39.2%
Year 3$50.3M+$7.6M$57.8M40.3%
Year 4$51.8M+$7.6M$59.3M41.3%
Year 5$53.3M+$7.6M$60.9M42.4%
$460.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$669.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$209.7M
Value Created
$60.9M
Exit EBITDA
$73.3M
Organic Growth
$75.6M
RCM Value Creation
$60.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.4M$2.2M$2.9M$3.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.4M$2.1M$2.8M$3.4M
A/R Days Reduction$874K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
Clean Claim Rate$46K$69K$92K$110K
Total$3.8M$5.7M$7.6M$9.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 247 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin32.0%-37.7%-8.4%9.0%
P98
Net-to-Gross43.8%25.1%36.5%53.8%
P61
Occupancy27.7%13.1%29.3%55.0%
P48
Rev/Bed$6.0M$432K$659K$1.3M
P98
Exp/Bed$4.1M$459K$877K$1.4M
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML