Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HOSPITALS OF PROVIDENCE EAST CAMPUS 2026-04-26 08:04 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HOSPITALS OF PROVIDENCE EAST CAMPUS
CCN 670047 | TX | 218 beds | Current EBITDA $83.4M → Pro Forma $100.3M (+$17.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$322.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$83.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$17.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$100.3M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$12.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$17.0M
Modeled Uplift
$12.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risks: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.4M (vs $17.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.4M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$6.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.9M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$206K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$17.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.4M$6.4M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$6.2M$177K$6.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$989K$2.9M$3.9M$12.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$206K$206K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT28.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.6M$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M$6.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.3M$2.6M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M
Clean Claim Rate$0$103K$206K$206K$206K$206K$206K$206K
Cumulative$0$4.6M$9.2M$13.8M$17.0M$17.0M$17.0M$17.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $17.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.0x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$83.4M$83.4M25.9%
Year 1$85.9M+$11.3M$97.2M30.1%
Year 2$88.4M+$17.0M$105.4M32.7%
Year 3$91.1M+$17.0M$108.1M33.5%
Year 4$93.8M+$17.0M$110.8M34.4%
Year 5$96.6M+$17.0M$113.6M35.2%
$833.6M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.25B
Exit EV (11x)
$416.0M
Value Created
$113.6M
Exit EBITDA
$132.8M
Organic Growth
$169.6M
RCM Value Creation
$113.6M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.2M$4.8M$6.4M$7.7M
A/R Days Reduction$2.0M$2.9M$3.9M$4.7M
Clean Claim Rate$103K$155K$206K$248K
Total$8.5M$12.7M$17.0M$20.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 148 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.9%-7.8%5.1%14.1%
P93
Net-to-Gross11.1%13.6%18.9%28.1%
P16
Occupancy82.2%50.9%66.5%75.7%
P86
Rev/Bed$1.5M$612K$1.2M$1.5M
P72
Exp/Bed$1.1M$631K$1.1M$1.5M
P52

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML