Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL OF ROCKWALL 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL OF ROCKWALL
CCN 670044 | TX | 53 beds | Current EBITDA $7.8M → Pro Forma $14.8M (+$7.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$134.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$7.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$7.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$5.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$7.1M
Modeled Uplift
$5.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$2.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.1M (vs $7.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$86K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$7.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.7M$2.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.6M$74K$2.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$412K$1.2M$1.6M$5.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$86K$86K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$671K$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$664K$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M$2.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$544K$1.1M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$43K$86K$86K$86K$86K$86K$86K
Cumulative$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M$7.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $7.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x64% / 11.9x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.1x76% / 16.9x
9.0x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.7x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x
10.0x55% / 8.8x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.5x65% / 12.2x67% / 12.9x
11.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 9.0x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
12.0x47% / 6.8x51% / 8.0x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.1x
Headroom (turns)
32%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 32% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.4x, adding 4.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$7.8M$7.8M5.8%
Year 1$8.0M+$4.7M$12.7M9.5%
Year 2$8.3M+$7.1M$15.3M11.4%
Year 3$8.5M+$7.1M$15.6M11.6%
Year 4$8.8M+$7.1M$15.8M11.8%
Year 5$9.0M+$7.1M$16.1M12.0%
$77.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$176.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$99.0M
Value Created
$16.1M
Exit EBITDA
$12.4M
Organic Growth
$70.6M
RCM Value Creation
$16.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.3M$2.0M$2.7M$3.2M
A/R Days Reduction$816K$1.2M$1.6M$2.0M
Clean Claim Rate$43K$64K$86K$103K
Total$3.5M$5.3M$7.1M$8.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 227 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin5.8%-14.4%0.1%12.1%
P61
Net-to-Gross29.6%21.3%31.3%51.0%
P45
Occupancy61.9%31.0%56.1%74.0%
P59
Rev/Bed$2.5M$327K$529K$1.0M
P96
Exp/Bed$2.4M$333K$494K$1.1M
P96

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML