Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ROUND ROCK HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 04:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ROUND ROCK HOSPITAL
CCN 670034 | TX | 165 beds | Current EBITDA $58.9M → Pro Forma $94.8M (+$35.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$681.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$58.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$35.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$94.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$26.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$35.8M
Modeled Uplift
$27.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$8.9M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $27.0M (vs $35.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$13.6M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$13.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$8.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$436K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$35.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$13.6M$13.6M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$13.1M$375K$13.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$2.1M$6.2M$8.3M$26.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$436K$436K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT30.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.4M$6.8M$10.2M$13.6M$13.6M$13.6M$13.6M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.4M$6.7M$10.1M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M$13.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.8M$5.5M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M$8.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$218K$436K$436K$436K$436K$436K$436K
Cumulative$0$9.8M$19.5M$29.1M$35.8M$35.8M$35.8M$35.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $35.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x57% / 9.7x62% / 11.1x66% / 12.6x68% / 13.3x69% / 14.0x
9.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x
10.0x48% / 7.1x52% / 8.2x56% / 9.4x58% / 10.0x60% / 10.5x
11.0x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.8x56% / 9.3x
12.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.2x
Headroom (turns)
19%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 19% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.3x, adding 3.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$58.9M$58.9M8.7%
Year 1$60.7M+$23.9M$84.6M12.4%
Year 2$62.5M+$35.8M$98.4M14.4%
Year 3$64.4M+$35.8M$100.3M14.7%
Year 4$66.3M+$35.8M$102.2M15.0%
Year 5$68.3M+$35.8M$104.2M15.3%
$589.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$1.15B
Exit EV (11x)
$556.6M
Value Created
$104.2M
Exit EBITDA
$93.9M
Organic Growth
$358.5M
RCM Value Creation
$104.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.8M$10.2M$13.6M$16.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.7M$10.1M$13.5M$16.2M
A/R Days Reduction$4.1M$6.2M$8.3M$10.0M
Clean Claim Rate$218K$327K$436K$523K
Total$17.9M$26.9M$35.8M$43.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 158 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.7%-9.3%2.3%14.5%
P60
Net-to-Gross27.0%14.4%21.1%30.9%
P65
Occupancy72.2%47.9%63.5%73.6%
P71
Rev/Bed$4.1M$380K$1.0M$1.5M
P99
Exp/Bed$3.8M$432K$965K$1.3M
P99

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML