Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE HEART HOSPITAL BAYLOR PLANO 2026-04-26 05:24 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE HEART HOSPITAL BAYLOR PLANO
CCN 670025 | TX | 109 beds | Current EBITDA $119.3M → Pro Forma $143.7M (+$24.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$464.6M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$119.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$24.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$143.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$17.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

78%
Realization (B)
$24.4M
Modeled Uplift
$19.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$5.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 78% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $19.2M (vs $24.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$9.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$9.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$5.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$297K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$24.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$9.3M$9.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$8.9M$256K$9.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.4M$4.2M$5.7M$17.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$297K$297K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT36.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$2.3M$4.6M$7.0M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M$9.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$2.3M$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M$9.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M$5.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$149K$297K$297K$297K$297K$297K$297K
Cumulative$0$6.7M$13.3M$19.8M$24.4M$24.4M$24.4M$24.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $24.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.6x45% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.1x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$119.3M$119.3M25.7%
Year 1$122.9M+$16.3M$139.2M30.0%
Year 2$126.6M+$24.4M$151.0M32.5%
Year 3$130.3M+$24.4M$154.8M33.3%
Year 4$134.3M+$24.4M$158.7M34.2%
Year 5$138.3M+$24.4M$162.7M35.0%
$1.19B
Entry EV (10x)
$1.79B
Exit EV (11x)
$597.1M
Value Created
$162.7M
Exit EBITDA
$190.0M
Organic Growth
$244.4M
RCM Value Creation
$162.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$4.6M$7.0M$9.3M$11.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$4.6M$6.9M$9.2M$11.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.8M$4.2M$5.7M$6.8M
Clean Claim Rate$149K$223K$297K$357K
Total$12.2M$18.3M$24.4M$29.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 189 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.7%-9.5%2.5%11.8%
P93
Net-to-Gross30.4%16.3%25.2%36.8%
P63
Occupancy85.6%44.7%59.7%75.3%
P90
Rev/Bed$4.3M$300K$581K$1.2M
P98
Exp/Bed$3.2M$309K$571K$1.2M
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML