Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WEBSTER SURGICAL SPECIALTY HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WEBSTER SURGICAL SPECIALTY HOSPITAL
CCN 670008 | TX | 20 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.4M → Pro Forma $2.1M (+$4.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$85.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$4.5M
Modeled Uplift
$3.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio increases execution like
Scale (Log Beds)Scale (Log Beds) has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.0M (vs $4.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.0M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$54K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.7M$1.7M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.6M$47K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$261K$773K$1.0M$3.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$54K$54K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT54.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$425K$850K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$421K$841K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$345K$689K$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M$1.0M
Clean Claim Rate$0$27K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K$54K
Cumulative$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.6M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M$4.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-9.7x
Pro Forma Leverage
16.2x
Headroom (turns)
249%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 249% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -9.7x, adding 108.7 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.4M$-2.4M-2.8%
Year 1$-2.5M+$3.0M$524K0.6%
Year 2$-2.5M+$4.5M$1.9M2.3%
Year 3$-2.6M+$4.5M$1.9M2.2%
Year 4$-2.7M+$4.5M$1.8M2.1%
Year 5$-2.8M+$4.5M$1.7M2.0%
$-23.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$18.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$42.6M
Value Created
$1.7M
Exit EBITDA
$-3.8M
Organic Growth
$44.7M
RCM Value Creation
$1.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$850K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$841K$1.3M$1.7M$2.0M
A/R Days Reduction$517K$775K$1.0M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$27K$41K$54K$65K
Total$2.2M$3.4M$4.5M$5.4M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 221 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-2.8%-41.9%-12.0%8.9%
P59
Net-to-Gross13.5%25.6%37.9%54.2%
P5
Occupancy21.4%12.5%25.4%52.2%
P43
Rev/Bed$4.2M$439K$670K$1.3M
P94
Exp/Bed$4.4M$500K$913K$1.4M
P97

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML