Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WASHAKIE MEDICAL CENTER 2026-04-26 13:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WASHAKIE MEDICAL CENTER
CCN 531306 | WY | 18 beds | Current EBITDA $-489K → Pro Forma $991K (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-489K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$991K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

62%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$918K
Risk-Adjusted
-$562K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 62% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Commercial Payer %, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.9M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$563K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$557K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$342K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$563K$563K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$542K$15K$557K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$86K$256K$342K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT66.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$141K$281K$422K$563K$563K$563K$563K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$139K$279K$418K$557K$557K$557K$557K
A/R Days Reduction$0$114K$228K$342K$342K$342K$342K$342K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$403K$806K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-4.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
10.7x
Headroom (turns)
164%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 164% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -4.2x, adding 103.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-489K$-489K-1.7%
Year 1$-504K+$987K$483K1.7%
Year 2$-519K+$1.5M$961K3.4%
Year 3$-534K+$1.5M$946K3.4%
Year 4$-550K+$1.5M$930K3.3%
Year 5$-567K+$1.5M$913K3.2%
$-4.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$10.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$14.9M
Value Created
$913K
Exit EBITDA
$-779K
Organic Growth
$14.8M
RCM Value Creation
$913K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$281K$422K$563K$675K
Denial Rate Reductio$279K$418K$557K$668K
A/R Days Reduction$171K$257K$342K$411K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$14K$18K$22K
Total$740K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 18 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.7%-24.6%-13.7%-2.1%
P78
Net-to-Gross61.7%54.5%61.9%66.5%
P44
Occupancy20.2%17.9%23.9%33.3%
P33
Rev/Bed$1.6M$960K$1.5M$2.0M
P56
Exp/Bed$1.6M$1.1M$1.6M$2.4M
P44

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML