Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — GRANITE HILLS HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:26 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — GRANITE HILLS HOSPITAL
CCN 524043 | WI | 36 beds | Current EBITDA $503K → Pro Forma $845K (+$341K)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$6.3M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$503K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$341K
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$845K
Pro Forma EBITDA
+543bps
Margin Improvement
$241K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$341K
Modeled Uplift
$235K
Risk-Adjusted
-$106K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $0.2M (vs $0.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$129K
+206bp
Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$126K
+200bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$77K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$10K
+15bp
Total EBITDA Impact$341K

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$121K$8K$129K$012mo
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$126K$126K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$19K$57K$77K$241K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$10K$10K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.6% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Denial Rate Reduction$0$32K$65K$97K$129K$129K$129K$129K
Cost to Collect$0$31K$63K$94K$126K$126K$126K$126K
A/R Days Reduction$0$26K$51K$77K$77K$77K$77K$77K
Clean Claim Rate$0$5K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K$10K
Cumulative$0$94K$188K$278K$341K$341K$341K$341K

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $341K is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x59% / 10.2x63% / 11.7x67% / 13.2x69% / 13.9x71% / 14.7x
9.0x54% / 8.7x59% / 10.0x63% / 11.3x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x
10.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
11.0x46% / 6.5x50% / 7.6x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.2x58% / 9.8x
12.0x42% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.5x
Headroom (turns)
22%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 22% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.0x, adding 3.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$503K$503K8.0%
Year 1$518K+$228K$746K11.9%
Year 2$534K+$341K$875K13.9%
Year 3$550K+$341K$891K14.2%
Year 4$567K+$341K$908K14.4%
Year 5$584K+$341K$925K14.7%
$5.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$10.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$5.1M
Value Created
$925K
Exit EBITDA
$802K
Organic Growth
$3.4M
RCM Value Creation
$925K
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Denial Rate Reductio$65K$97K$129K$155K
Cost to Collect$63K$94K$126K$151K
A/R Days Reduction$38K$57K$77K$92K
Clean Claim Rate$5K$7K$10K$12K
Total$171K$256K$341K$410K

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 89 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-50.0%-9.5%1.6%8.4%
P0
Net-to-Gross36.3%36.3%43.6%51.6%
P25
Occupancy65.9%28.1%40.1%51.6%
P90
Rev/Bed$175K$830K$1.9M$3.0M
P3
Exp/Bed$416K$1.0M$1.8M$2.9M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML