Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — BELLIN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER INC. 2026-04-26 16:27 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — BELLIN PSYCHIATRIC CENTER INC.
CCN 524038 | WI | 45 beds | Current EBITDA $-2.9M → Pro Forma $-1.4M (+$1.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$28.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-2.9M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-1.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.1M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

67%
Realization (C)
$1.5M
Modeled Uplift
$983K
Risk-Adjusted
-$490K
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 67% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count, Occupancy Rate. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Commercial Payer %. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$560K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$554K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$341K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$18K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$560K$560K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$539K$15K$554K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$86K$255K$341K$1.1M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$18K$18K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$140K$280K$420K$560K$560K$560K$560K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$139K$277K$416K$554K$554K$554K$554K
A/R Days Reduction$0$114K$227K$341K$341K$341K$341K$341K
Clean Claim Rate$0$9K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K$18K
Cumulative$0$401K$802K$1.2M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0x-100% / 0.0xLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-2.9M$-2.9M-10.4%
Year 1$-3.0M+$982K$-2.0M-7.2%
Year 2$-3.1M+$1.5M$-1.6M-5.8%
Year 3$-3.2M+$1.5M$-1.7M-6.1%
Year 4$-3.3M+$1.5M$-1.8M-6.4%
Year 5$-3.4M+$1.5M$-1.9M-6.8%
$-29.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$-20.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$8.2M
Value Created
$-1.9M
Exit EBITDA
$-4.6M
Organic Growth
$14.7M
RCM Value Creation
$-1.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$280K$420K$560K$672K
Denial Rate Reductio$277K$416K$554K$665K
A/R Days Reduction$170K$255K$341K$409K
Clean Claim Rate$9K$13K$18K$21K
Total$736K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-10.4%-9.3%0.4%8.3%
P22
Net-to-Gross50.7%33.3%42.7%51.2%
P71
Occupancy55.4%28.1%40.1%51.7%
P79
Rev/Bed$622K$867K$1.9M$3.0M
P17
Exp/Bed$687K$1.0M$1.8M$2.9M
P16

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML