Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — UW HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 12:35 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — UW HEALTH REHABILITATION HOSPITAL
CCN 523028 | WI | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $13.4M → Pro Forma $15.2M (+$1.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$36.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$13.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$15.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$1.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

75%
Realization (B)
$1.9M
Modeled Uplift
$1.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$476K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 75% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.4M (vs $1.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$721K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$714K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$439K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$23K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$721K$721K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$694K$20K$714K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$111K$328K$439K$1.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$23K$23K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$180K$360K$541K$721K$721K$721K$721K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$178K$357K$535K$714K$714K$714K$714K
A/R Days Reduction$0$146K$292K$439K$439K$439K$439K$439K
Clean Claim Rate$0$12K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K$23K
Cumulative$0$516K$1.0M$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.4x
9.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.0x
10.0x34% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x43% / 6.1x45% / 6.5x47% / 6.9x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.2x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x
12.0x25% / 3.1x31% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.2x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.9x
Headroom (turns)
-14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.4x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$13.4M$13.4M37.0%
Year 1$13.8M+$1.3M$15.0M41.7%
Year 2$14.2M+$1.9M$16.1M44.6%
Year 3$14.6M+$1.9M$16.5M45.7%
Year 4$15.0M+$1.9M$16.9M47.0%
Year 5$15.5M+$1.9M$17.4M48.2%
$133.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$191.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$57.6M
Value Created
$17.4M
Exit EBITDA
$21.3M
Organic Growth
$19.0M
RCM Value Creation
$17.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$360K$541K$721K$865K
Denial Rate Reductio$357K$535K$714K$856K
A/R Days Reduction$219K$329K$439K$526K
Clean Claim Rate$12K$17K$23K$28K
Total$948K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 87 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin37.0%-8.0%1.2%9.1%
P98
Net-to-Gross54.4%33.0%42.3%51.1%
P82
Occupancy90.6%29.3%40.8%52.1%
P98
Rev/Bed$721K$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M
P18
Exp/Bed$454K$1.1M$1.9M$3.0M
P7

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML