Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN 2026-04-26 10:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — REHABILITATION HOSPITAL OF WISCONSIN
CCN 523027 | WI | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $8.2M → Pro Forma $9.5M (+$1.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$24.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$1.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.5M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$953K
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$1.3M
Modeled Uplift
$957K
Risk-Adjusted
-$351K
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedLower Revenue per Bed reduces execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Bed Count. Risks: Revenue per Bed, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $1.0M (vs $1.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$497K
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$492K
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$302K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$16K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$1.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$497K$497K$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$479K$14K$492K$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$76K$226K$302K$953K9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$16K$16K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$124K$249K$373K$497K$497K$497K$497K
Denial Rate Reduction$0$123K$246K$369K$492K$492K$492K$492K
A/R Days Reduction$0$101K$202K$302K$302K$302K$302K$302K
Clean Claim Rate$0$8K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K$16K
Cumulative$0$356K$712K$1.1M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $1.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.5x54% / 8.5x55% / 9.1x57% / 9.6x
9.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
10.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.8x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 5.0x40% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-12%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -12% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.2 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.2M$8.2M33.1%
Year 1$8.5M+$872K$9.3M37.6%
Year 2$8.7M+$1.3M$10.0M40.3%
Year 3$9.0M+$1.3M$10.3M41.4%
Year 4$9.3M+$1.3M$10.6M42.5%
Year 5$9.5M+$1.3M$10.8M43.6%
$82.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$119.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$37.0M
Value Created
$10.8M
Exit EBITDA
$13.1M
Organic Growth
$13.1M
RCM Value Creation
$10.8M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$249K$373K$497K$597K
Denial Rate Reductio$246K$369K$492K$591K
A/R Days Reduction$151K$227K$302K$363K
Clean Claim Rate$8K$12K$16K$19K
Total$654K$981K$1.3M$1.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin33.1%-8.1%2.0%8.6%
P96
Net-to-Gross68.3%34.2%43.1%51.2%
P96
Occupancy83.0%28.1%39.6%51.5%
P96
Rev/Bed$621K$867K$1.9M$3.0M
P16
Exp/Bed$416K$1.0M$1.8M$2.9M
P6

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML