Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MERCY WALWORTH HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 05:02 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MERCY WALWORTH HOSPITAL
CCN 521357 | WI | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $27.3M → Pro Forma $59.7M (+$32.4M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$616.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$27.3M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$32.4M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$59.7M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$23.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

90%
Realization (A)
$32.4M
Modeled Uplift
$29.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.3M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 90% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $29.1M (vs $32.4M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$12.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$12.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$7.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$395K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$32.4M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$12.3M$12.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$11.9M$339K$12.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.9M$5.6M$7.5M$23.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$395K$395K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$3.1M$6.2M$9.2M$12.3M$12.3M$12.3M$12.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$3.1M$6.1M$9.2M$12.2M$12.2M$12.2M$12.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$2.5M$5.0M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$197K$395K$395K$395K$395K$395K$395K
Cumulative$0$8.8M$17.7M$26.3M$32.4M$32.4M$32.4M$32.4M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $32.4M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x69% / 13.9x74% / 15.8x78% / 17.7x80% / 18.7x81% / 19.6x
9.0x64% / 12.0x69% / 13.7x73% / 15.4x75% / 16.2x76% / 17.1x
10.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.1x
11.0x56% / 9.2x60% / 10.6x64% / 12.0x66% / 12.7x68% / 13.4x
12.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.7x63% / 11.4x64% / 12.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.6x
Headroom (turns)
40%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 40% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.9x, adding 4.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$27.3M$27.3M4.4%
Year 1$28.1M+$21.6M$49.7M8.1%
Year 2$29.0M+$32.4M$61.4M10.0%
Year 3$29.8M+$32.4M$62.3M10.1%
Year 4$30.7M+$32.4M$63.2M10.2%
Year 5$31.7M+$32.4M$64.1M10.4%
$273.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$704.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$431.9M
Value Created
$64.1M
Exit EBITDA
$43.5M
Organic Growth
$324.3M
RCM Value Creation
$64.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$6.2M$9.2M$12.3M$14.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$6.1M$9.2M$12.2M$14.6M
A/R Days Reduction$3.8M$5.6M$7.5M$9.0M
Clean Claim Rate$197K$296K$395K$473K
Total$16.2M$24.3M$32.4M$38.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.4%-9.9%1.6%8.6%
P57
Net-to-Gross29.0%38.2%47.0%52.9%
P7
Occupancy34.8%25.5%37.7%49.9%
P43
Rev/Bed$24.7M$937K$2.0M$3.1M
P99
Exp/Bed$23.6M$1.1M$1.8M$3.0M
P99

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML