Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — SOUTHWEST HEALTH CENTER 2026-04-27 03:31 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — SOUTHWEST HEALTH CENTER
CCN 521354 | WI | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $8.6M → Pro Forma $14.1M (+$5.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
EBITDA BRIDGE  ·  CCN 521354

SOUTHWEST HEALTH CENTER
value-creation walk.

7-lever RCM bridge from current EBITDA to pro-forma — denial / underpay / DAR / coding / contract / cost discipline / cash acceleration. Each lever shows current vs benchmark target with data provenance.

$103.7M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$8.6M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$14.1M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.0M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

68%
Realization (C)
$5.5M
Modeled Uplift
$3.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.8M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 68% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.7M (vs $5.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$66K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.1M$2.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.0M$57K$2.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$318K$944K$1.3M$4.0M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$66K$66K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$519K$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$513K$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$421K$841K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$33K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K$66K
Cumulative$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.4M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M$5.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x58% / 9.9x62% / 11.3x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.2x
9.0x53% / 8.4x58% / 9.7x62% / 11.0x63% / 11.6x65% / 12.3x
10.0x49% / 7.2x53% / 8.4x57% / 9.6x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.7x
11.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x
12.0x41% / 5.5x45% / 6.5x49% / 7.4x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.2x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.3x
Headroom (turns)
20%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 20% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.2x, adding 3.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$8.6M$8.6M8.3%
Year 1$8.9M+$3.6M$12.5M12.1%
Year 2$9.1M+$5.5M$14.6M14.1%
Year 3$9.4M+$5.5M$14.9M14.3%
Year 4$9.7M+$5.5M$15.1M14.6%
Year 5$10.0M+$5.5M$15.4M14.9%
$86.1M
Entry EV (10x)
$169.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$83.7M
Value Created
$15.4M
Exit EBITDA
$13.7M
Organic Growth
$54.6M
RCM Value Creation
$15.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.0M$1.6M$2.1M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.0M$1.5M$2.1M$2.5M
A/R Days Reduction$631K$947K$1.3M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$33K$50K$66K$80K
Total$2.7M$4.1M$5.5M$6.5M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin8.3%-9.9%1.6%8.6%
P72
Net-to-Gross48.9%38.2%47.0%52.9%
P56
Occupancy34.2%25.5%37.7%49.9%
P41
Rev/Bed$4.1M$937K$2.0M$3.1M
P89
Exp/Bed$3.8M$1.1M$1.8M$3.0M
P85

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML