Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — WESTERN WISCONSIN HEALTH 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — WESTERN WISCONSIN HEALTH
CCN 521347 | WI | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $-702K → Pro Forma $2.6M (+$3.3M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$63.1M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-702K
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.3M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$2.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$3.3M
Modeled Uplift
$2.2M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioHigher Net-to-Gross Ratio reduces execution likeli
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate, Net-to-Gross Ratio. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.2M (vs $3.3M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$768K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$40K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.3M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$35K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$194K$574K$768K$2.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$40K$40K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$315K$631K$946K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$312K$625K$937K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$256K$512K$768K$768K$768K$768K$768K
Clean Claim Rate$0$20K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K$40K
Cumulative$0$904K$1.8M$2.7M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M$3.3M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.3M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
9.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
10.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
11.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x
12.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x-100% / 0.0x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
-2.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
8.8x
Headroom (turns)
135%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 135% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to -2.3x, adding 101.3 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-702K$-702K-1.1%
Year 1$-723K+$2.2M$1.5M2.4%
Year 2$-745K+$3.3M$2.6M4.1%
Year 3$-767K+$3.3M$2.6M4.0%
Year 4$-790K+$3.3M$2.5M4.0%
Year 5$-814K+$3.3M$2.5M4.0%
$-7.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$27.6M
Exit EV (11x)
$34.6M
Value Created
$2.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-1.1M
Organic Growth
$33.2M
RCM Value Creation
$2.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$631K$946K$1.3M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reductio$625K$937K$1.2M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$384K$576K$768K$921K
Clean Claim Rate$20K$30K$40K$48K
Total$1.7M$2.5M$3.3M$4.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-1.1%-9.9%1.6%8.6%
P43
Net-to-Gross65.0%38.2%47.0%52.9%
P93
Occupancy32.2%25.5%37.7%49.9%
P39
Rev/Bed$2.5M$937K$2.0M$3.1M
P62
Exp/Bed$2.6M$1.1M$1.8M$3.0M
P61

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML