Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — STOUGHTON HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION 2026-04-26 09:33 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — STOUGHTON HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION
CCN 521343 | WI | 22 beds | Current EBITDA $5.8M → Pro Forma $8.8M (+$3.0M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$56.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.8M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.0M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$8.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

66%
Realization (C)
$3.0M
Modeled Uplift
$2.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 66% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.0M (vs $3.0M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.1M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$691K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$36K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.0M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.1M$1.1M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.1M$31K$1.1M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$174K$517K$691K$2.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$36K$36K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.7% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$284K$568K$852K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$281K$562K$843K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
A/R Days Reduction$0$230K$461K$691K$691K$691K$691K$691K
Clean Claim Rate$0$18K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K$36K
Cumulative$0$813K$1.6M$2.4M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M$3.0M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.0M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x55% / 9.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 11.7x65% / 12.4x67% / 13.1x
9.0x50% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.1x61% / 10.7x62% / 11.3x
10.0x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.7x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x58% / 9.8x
11.0x41% / 5.7x46% / 6.7x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
12.0x38% / 4.9x42% / 5.8x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
5.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.9x
Headroom (turns)
14%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 14% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 5.6x, adding 2.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.8M$5.8M10.2%
Year 1$6.0M+$2.0M$7.9M14.0%
Year 2$6.1M+$3.0M$9.1M16.1%
Year 3$6.3M+$3.0M$9.3M16.4%
Year 4$6.5M+$3.0M$9.5M16.7%
Year 5$6.7M+$3.0M$9.7M17.1%
$57.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$106.5M
Exit EV (11x)
$48.8M
Value Created
$9.7M
Exit EBITDA
$9.2M
Organic Growth
$29.9M
RCM Value Creation
$9.7M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$568K$852K$1.1M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$562K$843K$1.1M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$345K$518K$691K$829K
Clean Claim Rate$18K$27K$36K$44K
Total$1.5M$2.2M$3.0M$3.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 85 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin10.2%-8.7%2.0%8.6%
P77
Net-to-Gross37.8%38.4%46.8%52.7%
P20
Occupancy30.5%25.0%37.1%49.4%
P35
Rev/Bed$2.6M$1.0M$2.1M$3.1M
P63
Exp/Bed$2.3M$1.1M$1.9M$3.0M
P56

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML