Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — THE RICHLAND HOSPITAL INC 2026-04-26 12:36 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — THE RICHLAND HOSPITAL INC
CCN 521341 | WI | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $2.5M → Pro Forma $6.0M (+$3.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$66.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$6.0M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.6M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$3.5M
Modeled Uplift
$2.4M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.4M (vs $3.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.3M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$815K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$43K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.3M$1.3M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.3M$37K$1.3M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$205K$609K$815K$2.6M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$43K$43K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$335K$669K$1.0M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$331K$663K$994K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
A/R Days Reduction$0$272K$543K$815K$815K$815K$815K$815K
Clean Claim Rate$0$21K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K$43K
Cumulative$0$959K$1.9M$2.9M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M$3.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x73% / 15.6x78% / 17.7x82% / 19.8x84% / 20.8x85% / 21.9x
9.0x68% / 13.5x73% / 15.4x77% / 17.2x79% / 18.1x80% / 19.1x
10.0x64% / 11.8x68% / 13.5x72% / 15.2x74% / 16.0x76% / 16.8x
11.0x60% / 10.4x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.0x
12.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x67% / 12.8x68% / 13.5x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
3.0x
Headroom (turns)
46%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 46% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.5x, adding 5.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.5M$2.5M3.7%
Year 1$2.6M+$2.3M$4.9M7.3%
Year 2$2.6M+$3.5M$6.2M9.2%
Year 3$2.7M+$3.5M$6.2M9.3%
Year 4$2.8M+$3.5M$6.3M9.4%
Year 5$2.9M+$3.5M$6.4M9.6%
$24.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$70.4M
Exit EV (11x)
$45.6M
Value Created
$6.4M
Exit EBITDA
$4.0M
Organic Growth
$35.2M
RCM Value Creation
$6.4M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$669K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$663K$994K$1.3M$1.6M
A/R Days Reduction$407K$611K$815K$977K
Clean Claim Rate$21K$32K$43K$51K
Total$1.8M$2.6M$3.5M$4.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin3.7%-9.9%1.6%8.6%
P53
Net-to-Gross48.2%38.2%47.0%52.9%
P54
Occupancy48.2%25.5%37.7%49.9%
P70
Rev/Bed$2.7M$937K$2.0M$3.1M
P67
Exp/Bed$2.6M$1.1M$1.8M$3.0M
P62

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML