Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MCHS-RED CEDAR 2026-04-26 05:23 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MCHS-RED CEDAR
CCN 521340 | WI | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $20.7M → Pro Forma $27.2M (+$6.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$123.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$20.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$6.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$27.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

76%
Realization (B)
$6.5M
Modeled Uplift
$5.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.5M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 76% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $5.0M (vs $6.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.4M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.5M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$79K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$6.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.5M$2.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.4M$68K$2.4M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$379K$1.1M$1.5M$4.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$79K$79K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$617K$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M$2.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$611K$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
A/R Days Reduction$0$501K$1.0M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Clean Claim Rate$0$39K$79K$79K$79K$79K$79K$79K
Cumulative$0$1.8M$3.5M$5.3M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M$6.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $6.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
9.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.4x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x52% / 8.2x
11.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$20.7M$20.7M16.8%
Year 1$21.4M+$4.3M$25.7M20.8%
Year 2$22.0M+$6.5M$28.5M23.1%
Year 3$22.7M+$6.5M$29.2M23.6%
Year 4$23.3M+$6.5M$29.8M24.2%
Year 5$24.0M+$6.5M$30.5M24.7%
$207.4M
Entry EV (10x)
$335.9M
Exit EV (11x)
$128.5M
Value Created
$30.5M
Exit EBITDA
$33.0M
Organic Growth
$64.9M
RCM Value Creation
$30.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.2M$1.9M$2.5M$3.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
A/R Days Reduction$751K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Clean Claim Rate$39K$59K$79K$95K
Total$3.2M$4.9M$6.5M$7.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.8%-9.9%1.6%8.6%
P87
Net-to-Gross47.3%38.2%47.0%52.9%
P51
Occupancy64.8%25.5%37.7%49.9%
P86
Rev/Bed$4.9M$937K$2.0M$3.1M
P93
Exp/Bed$4.1M$1.1M$1.8M$3.0M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML