Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — HAYWARD AREA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 08:03 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — HAYWARD AREA MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 521336 | WI | 25 beds | Current EBITDA $5.4M → Pro Forma $9.2M (+$3.9M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$73.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$5.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.9M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$9.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$3.9M
Modeled Uplift
$2.7M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.2M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.7M (vs $3.9M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$893K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$47K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.9M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.5M$1.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.4M$40K$1.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$225K$668K$893K$2.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$47K$47K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$367K$734K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$363K$727K$1.1M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M$1.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$298K$595K$893K$893K$893K$893K$893K
Clean Claim Rate$0$23K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K$47K
Cumulative$0$1.1M$2.1M$3.1M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M$3.9M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.9M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x60% / 10.5x64% / 12.0x68% / 13.5x70% / 14.3x72% / 15.0x
9.0x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.3x63% / 11.7x65% / 12.3x67% / 13.0x
10.0x51% / 7.7x55% / 8.9x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x
11.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
12.0x43% / 5.9x47% / 6.9x51% / 7.9x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
4.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
1.6x
Headroom (turns)
24%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 24% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 4.9x, adding 3.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$5.4M$5.4M7.3%
Year 1$5.5M+$2.6M$8.1M11.1%
Year 2$5.7M+$3.9M$9.6M13.0%
Year 3$5.9M+$3.9M$9.7M13.3%
Year 4$6.1M+$3.9M$9.9M13.5%
Year 5$6.2M+$3.9M$10.1M13.8%
$53.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$111.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$57.3M
Value Created
$10.1M
Exit EBITDA
$8.6M
Organic Growth
$38.6M
RCM Value Creation
$10.1M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$734K$1.1M$1.5M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$727K$1.1M$1.5M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$447K$670K$893K$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$23K$35K$47K$56K
Total$1.9M$2.9M$3.9M$4.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 88 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin7.3%-9.9%1.6%8.6%
P66
Net-to-Gross51.0%38.2%47.0%52.9%
P68
Occupancy44.3%25.5%37.7%49.9%
P64
Rev/Bed$2.9M$937K$2.0M$3.1M
P71
Exp/Bed$2.7M$1.1M$1.8M$3.0M
P68

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML