Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — PRAIRIE DU CHIEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 15:51 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — PRAIRIE DU CHIEN MEMORIAL HOSPITAL
CCN 521330 | WI | 24 beds | Current EBITDA $2.7M → Pro Forma $5.8M (+$3.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$60.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$2.7M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$3.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$5.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$2.3M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

65%
Realization (C)
$3.2M
Modeled Uplift
$2.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 65% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.1M (vs $3.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$734K
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$39K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$3.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.2M$1.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.2M$33K$1.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$185K$549K$734K$2.3M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$39K$39K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT52.5% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$302K$604K$905K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$299K$598K$896K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$245K$490K$734K$734K$734K$734K$734K
Clean Claim Rate$0$19K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K$39K
Cumulative$0$865K$1.7M$2.6M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M$3.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $3.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x69% / 14.0x74% / 15.9x78% / 17.8x80% / 18.8x82% / 19.7x
9.0x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.8x73% / 15.5x75% / 16.3x77% / 17.2x
10.0x60% / 10.5x65% / 12.1x69% / 13.6x70% / 14.4x72% / 15.1x
11.0x56% / 9.3x61% / 10.7x65% / 12.1x66% / 12.8x68% / 13.4x
12.0x52% / 8.2x57% / 9.5x61% / 10.8x63% / 11.4x65% / 12.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
3.9x
Pro Forma Leverage
2.6x
Headroom (turns)
41%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 41% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 3.9x, adding 4.6 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$2.7M$2.7M4.4%
Year 1$2.7M+$2.1M$4.9M8.0%
Year 2$2.8M+$3.2M$6.0M9.9%
Year 3$2.9M+$3.2M$6.1M10.1%
Year 4$3.0M+$3.2M$6.2M10.2%
Year 5$3.1M+$3.2M$6.3M10.4%
$26.5M
Entry EV (10x)
$68.8M
Exit EV (11x)
$42.2M
Value Created
$6.3M
Exit EBITDA
$4.2M
Organic Growth
$31.8M
RCM Value Creation
$6.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$604K$905K$1.2M$1.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$598K$896K$1.2M$1.4M
A/R Days Reduction$367K$551K$734K$881K
Clean Claim Rate$19K$29K$39K$46K
Total$1.6M$2.4M$3.2M$3.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 86 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin4.4%-9.6%1.6%8.6%
P56
Net-to-Gross57.2%38.4%47.0%52.5%
P85
Occupancy30.2%25.1%37.7%49.7%
P34
Rev/Bed$2.5M$976K$2.1M$3.1M
P61
Exp/Bed$2.4M$1.1M$1.9M$3.0M
P58

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML