Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST MARYS HOSPITAL SUPERIOR 2026-04-26 10:38 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST MARYS HOSPITAL SUPERIOR
CCN 521329 | WI | 16 beds | Current EBITDA $18.2M → Pro Forma $23.4M (+$5.2M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$98.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$18.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.2M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$23.4M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.8M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

78%
Realization (B)
$5.2M
Modeled Uplift
$4.0M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.1M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Higher Commercial Payer % increases execution like
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 78% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.0M (vs $5.2M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$63K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.2M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.0M$2.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$54K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$301K$894K$1.2M$3.8M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$63K$63K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.8% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$491K$982K$1.5M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M$2.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$486K$972K$1.5M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$398K$797K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$31K$63K$63K$63K$63K$63K$63K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M$5.2M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.2M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.5x57% / 9.7x59% / 10.2x61% / 10.8x
9.0x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.2x52% / 8.2x54% / 8.7x56% / 9.3x
10.0x39% / 5.2x44% / 6.1x48% / 7.1x50% / 7.5x52% / 8.0x
11.0x35% / 4.4x39% / 5.3x44% / 6.1x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
12.0x31% / 3.8x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x44% / 6.1x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.6x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.1x
Headroom (turns)
-1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.6x, adding 1.9 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$18.2M$18.2M18.6%
Year 1$18.8M+$3.4M$22.2M22.6%
Year 2$19.3M+$5.2M$24.5M24.9%
Year 3$19.9M+$5.2M$25.1M25.5%
Year 4$20.5M+$5.2M$25.7M26.1%
Year 5$21.1M+$5.2M$26.3M26.8%
$182.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$289.1M
Exit EV (11x)
$107.0M
Value Created
$26.3M
Exit EBITDA
$29.0M
Organic Growth
$51.7M
RCM Value Creation
$26.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$982K$1.5M$2.0M$2.4M
Denial Rate Reductio$972K$1.5M$1.9M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$598K$896K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$31K$47K$63K$75K
Total$2.6M$3.9M$5.2M$6.2M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 70 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin18.6%-3.5%3.2%8.3%
P94
Net-to-Gross46.5%42.2%48.2%53.8%
P41
Occupancy65.9%21.9%36.5%47.9%
P94
Rev/Bed$6.1M$1.3M$2.2M$3.4M
P93
Exp/Bed$5.0M$1.2M$1.9M$3.1M
P89

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML