Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARYS JANESVILLE HOSPITAL 2026-04-26 07:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ST. MARYS JANESVILLE HOSPITAL
CCN 520208 | WI | 50 beds | Current EBITDA $24.5M → Pro Forma $29.6M (+$5.1M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$96.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$24.5M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.1M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$29.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

69%
Realization (C)
$5.1M
Modeled Uplift
$3.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.6M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 69% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Bed Count. Risk-adjusted uplift: $3.5M (vs $5.1M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.2M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$62K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.1M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.9M$1.9M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.9M$53K$1.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$296K$877K$1.2M$3.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$62K$62K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$482K$964K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$477K$955K$1.4M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M$1.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$391K$782K$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M$1.2M
Clean Claim Rate$0$31K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K$62K
Cumulative$0$1.4M$2.8M$4.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M$5.1M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.1M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x46% / 6.7x51% / 7.8x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x59% / 10.1x
9.0x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.6x50% / 7.6x52% / 8.1x54% / 8.6x
10.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x46% / 6.5x47% / 7.0x49% / 7.4x
11.0x32% / 4.0x37% / 4.8x41% / 5.6x43% / 6.0x45% / 6.4x
12.0x28% / 3.4x33% / 4.2x37% / 4.9x39% / 5.3x41% / 5.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.5x
Headroom (turns)
-8%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -8% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.0x, adding 1.5 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$24.5M$24.5M25.4%
Year 1$25.2M+$3.4M$28.6M29.7%
Year 2$26.0M+$5.1M$31.0M32.2%
Year 3$26.8M+$5.1M$31.8M33.0%
Year 4$27.6M+$5.1M$32.6M33.8%
Year 5$28.4M+$5.1M$33.5M34.7%
$244.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$368.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$123.2M
Value Created
$33.5M
Exit EBITDA
$39.0M
Organic Growth
$50.7M
RCM Value Creation
$33.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$964K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
Denial Rate Reductio$955K$1.4M$1.9M$2.3M
A/R Days Reduction$587K$880K$1.2M$1.4M
Clean Claim Rate$31K$46K$62K$74K
Total$2.5M$3.8M$5.1M$6.1M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 87 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin25.4%-8.0%1.2%9.1%
P93
Net-to-Gross32.0%33.0%42.3%51.1%
P21
Occupancy51.8%29.3%40.8%52.1%
P70
Rev/Bed$1.9M$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M
P45
Exp/Bed$1.4M$1.1M$1.9M$3.0M
P33

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML