Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AURORA MEDICAL CENTER GRAFTON 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AURORA MEDICAL CENTER GRAFTON
CCN 520207 | WI | 132 beds | Current EBITDA $50.1M → Pro Forma $65.9M (+$15.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$300.4M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$50.1M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$15.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$65.9M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$11.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

73%
Realization (B)
$15.8M
Modeled Uplift
$11.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$4.3M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 73% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $11.5M (vs $15.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$6.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$5.9M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$3.7M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$192K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$15.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$6.0M$6.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$5.8M$165K$5.9M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$922K$2.7M$3.7M$11.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$192K$192K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M$6.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.5M$3.0M$4.5M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M$5.9M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.2M$2.4M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M$3.7M
Clean Claim Rate$0$96K$192K$192K$192K$192K$192K$192K
Cumulative$0$4.3M$8.6M$12.8M$15.8M$15.8M$15.8M$15.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $15.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
9.0x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.4x45% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x51% / 7.8x53% / 8.2x
11.0x36% / 4.6x40% / 5.5x45% / 6.3x47% / 6.8x48% / 7.2x
12.0x32% / 3.9x37% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x45% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.4x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.1x
Headroom (turns)
1%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 1% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.4x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$50.1M$50.1M16.7%
Year 1$51.6M+$10.5M$62.1M20.7%
Year 2$53.2M+$15.8M$69.0M23.0%
Year 3$54.7M+$15.8M$70.6M23.5%
Year 4$56.4M+$15.8M$72.2M24.0%
Year 5$58.1M+$15.8M$73.9M24.6%
$501.0M
Entry EV (10x)
$812.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$311.7M
Value Created
$73.9M
Exit EBITDA
$79.8M
Organic Growth
$158.0M
RCM Value Creation
$73.9M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.0M$4.5M$6.0M$7.2M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.0M$4.5M$5.9M$7.1M
A/R Days Reduction$1.8M$2.7M$3.7M$4.4M
Clean Claim Rate$96K$144K$192K$231K
Total$7.9M$11.9M$15.8M$19.0M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 36 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin16.7%-11.2%1.0%13.8%
P76
Net-to-Gross27.1%28.7%33.1%38.2%
P17
Occupancy71.8%44.6%56.1%64.2%
P86
Rev/Bed$2.3M$1.2M$1.9M$2.7M
P63
Exp/Bed$1.9M$1.4M$1.8M$2.6M
P53

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML