Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — AURORA MEDICAL CENTER - SUMMIT 2026-04-26 03:42 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — AURORA MEDICAL CENTER - SUMMIT
CCN 520206 | WI | 91 beds | Current EBITDA $34.2M → Pro Forma $44.8M (+$10.5M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$200.2M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$34.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$10.5M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$44.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$7.7M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

72%
Realization (B)
$10.5M
Modeled Uplift
$7.5M
Risk-Adjusted
-$3.0M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateHigher Occupancy Rate increases execution likeliho
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Bed CountBed Count has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 72% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Occupancy Rate, Revenue per Bed. Risk-adjusted uplift: $7.5M (vs $10.5M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$4.0M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$4.0M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$2.4M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$128K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$10.5M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$4.0M$4.0M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$3.9M$110K$4.0M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$614K$1.8M$2.4M$7.7M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$128K$128K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT37.3% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.0M$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$991K$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M$4.0M
A/R Days Reduction$0$812K$1.6M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M$2.4M
Clean Claim Rate$0$64K$128K$128K$128K$128K$128K$128K
Cumulative$0$2.9M$5.7M$8.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M$10.5M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $10.5M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x50% / 7.5x54% / 8.7x58% / 9.9x60% / 10.5x62% / 11.1x
9.0x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.3x53% / 8.4x55% / 8.9x57% / 9.5x
10.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.3x49% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.2x
11.0x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.4x44% / 6.3x46% / 6.7x48% / 7.2x
12.0x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.7x41% / 5.5x43% / 5.9x44% / 6.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
6.5x
Pro Forma Leverage
0.0x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 6.5x, adding 2.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$34.2M$34.2M17.1%
Year 1$35.3M+$7.0M$42.3M21.1%
Year 2$36.3M+$10.5M$46.8M23.4%
Year 3$37.4M+$10.5M$47.9M23.9%
Year 4$38.5M+$10.5M$49.1M24.5%
Year 5$39.7M+$10.5M$50.2M25.1%
$342.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$552.3M
Exit EV (11x)
$210.0M
Value Created
$50.2M
Exit EBITDA
$54.5M
Organic Growth
$105.3M
RCM Value Creation
$50.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
Denial Rate Reductio$2.0M$3.0M$4.0M$4.8M
A/R Days Reduction$1.2M$1.8M$2.4M$2.9M
Clean Claim Rate$64K$96K$128K$154K
Total$5.3M$7.9M$10.5M$12.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 39 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin17.1%-11.7%-2.3%13.3%
P82
Net-to-Gross33.0%27.9%32.0%37.3%
P56
Occupancy65.8%41.1%51.8%60.6%
P87
Rev/Bed$2.2M$978K$1.8M$2.4M
P69
Exp/Bed$1.8M$1.2M$1.7M$2.3M
P54

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML