Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — OAK LEAF SURGICAL HOSPITAL LLC 2026-04-26 07:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — OAK LEAF SURGICAL HOSPITAL LLC
CCN 520196 | WI | 13 beds | Current EBITDA $37.4M → Pro Forma $43.2M (+$5.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$109.8M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$37.4M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$5.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$43.2M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$4.2M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

70%
Realization (B)
$5.8M
Modeled Uplift
$4.1M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 70% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $4.1M (vs $5.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$2.2M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.3M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$70K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$5.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$2.2M$2.2M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$2.1M$60K$2.2M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$337K$1000K$1.3M$4.2M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$70K$70K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT53.9% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$549K$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$544K$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M$2.2M
A/R Days Reduction$0$446K$891K$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$0$35K$70K$70K$70K$70K$70K$70K
Cumulative$0$1.6M$3.1M$4.7M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M$5.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $5.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x45% / 6.4x49% / 7.4x53% / 8.5x55% / 9.0x57% / 9.6x
9.0x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x48% / 7.2x50% / 7.7x52% / 8.1x
10.0x35% / 4.4x40% / 5.3x44% / 6.2x46% / 6.6x48% / 7.0x
11.0x30% / 3.7x35% / 4.5x40% / 5.3x42% / 5.7x43% / 6.1x
12.0x26% / 3.2x31% / 3.9x36% / 4.6x38% / 4.9x40% / 5.3x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
7.3x
Pro Forma Leverage
-0.8x
Headroom (turns)
-13%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline -13% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 7.3x, adding 1.1 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$37.4M$37.4M34.1%
Year 1$38.5M+$3.9M$42.4M38.6%
Year 2$39.7M+$5.8M$45.5M41.4%
Year 3$40.9M+$5.8M$46.7M42.5%
Year 4$42.1M+$5.8M$47.9M43.6%
Year 5$43.4M+$5.8M$49.2M44.7%
$374.2M
Entry EV (10x)
$540.7M
Exit EV (11x)
$166.5M
Value Created
$49.2M
Exit EBITDA
$59.6M
Organic Growth
$57.8M
RCM Value Creation
$49.2M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
Denial Rate Reductio$1.1M$1.6M$2.2M$2.6M
A/R Days Reduction$668K$1.0M$1.3M$1.6M
Clean Claim Rate$35K$53K$70K$84K
Total$2.9M$4.3M$5.8M$6.9M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 69 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin34.1%-3.6%2.8%8.3%
P97
Net-to-Gross50.6%42.2%48.5%53.9%
P62
Occupancy16.1%22.3%37.1%48.1%
P16
Rev/Bed$8.4M$1.2M$2.2M$3.4M
P97
Exp/Bed$5.6M$1.2M$1.9M$3.1M
P93

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML