Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SE WISCONSIN HOSPITAL INC 2026-04-26 03:43 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — ASCENSION SE WISCONSIN HOSPITAL INC
CCN 520136 | WI | 301 beds | Current EBITDA $3.0M → Pro Forma $22.8M (+$19.8M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$377.0M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$3.0M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$19.8M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$22.8M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$14.5M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$19.8M
Modeled Uplift
$12.8M
Risk-Adjusted
-$7.1M
Execution Discount
Bed CountHigher Bed Count reduces execution likelihood
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedRevenue per Bed has minimal effect on execution
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Net-to-Gross RatioNet-to-Gross Ratio has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Risks: Bed Count, Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $12.8M (vs $19.8M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$7.5M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$7.5M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$4.6M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$241K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$19.8M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$7.5M$7.5M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$7.3M$207K$7.5M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$1.2M$3.4M$4.6M$14.5M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$241K$241K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT38.1% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$1.9M$3.8M$5.7M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$1.9M$3.7M$5.6M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M$7.5M
A/R Days Reduction$0$1.5M$3.1M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M
Clean Claim Rate$0$121K$241K$241K$241K$241K$241K$241K
Cumulative$0$5.4M$10.8M$16.1M$19.8M$19.8M$19.8M$19.8M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $19.8M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0x122% / 53.9x127% / 60.3x132% / 66.6x134% / 69.8x136% / 73.0x
9.0x117% / 47.6x121% / 53.2x126% / 58.9x128% / 61.7x130% / 64.5x
10.0x112% / 42.5x117% / 47.6x121% / 52.7x123% / 55.2x125% / 57.7x
11.0x107% / 38.3x112% / 43.0x117% / 47.6x119% / 49.9x121% / 52.2x
12.0x103% / 34.9x108% / 39.1x113% / 43.3x115% / 45.5x117% / 47.6x

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

8.5x
Entry Leverage
1.1x
Pro Forma Leverage
5.4x
Headroom (turns)
83%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 83% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 8.5x to 1.1x, adding 7.4 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$3.0M$3.0M0.8%
Year 1$3.1M+$13.2M$16.3M4.3%
Year 2$3.2M+$19.8M$23.0M6.1%
Year 3$3.3M+$19.8M$23.1M6.1%
Year 4$3.4M+$19.8M$23.2M6.1%
Year 5$3.5M+$19.8M$23.3M6.2%
$29.8M
Entry EV (10x)
$256.2M
Exit EV (11x)
$226.4M
Value Created
$23.3M
Exit EBITDA
$4.7M
Organic Growth
$198.4M
RCM Value Creation
$23.3M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$3.8M$5.7M$7.5M$9.0M
Denial Rate Reductio$3.7M$5.6M$7.5M$9.0M
A/R Days Reduction$2.3M$3.4M$4.6M$5.5M
Clean Claim Rate$121K$181K$241K$290K
Total$9.9M$14.9M$19.8M$23.8M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 25 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin0.8%-12.3%0.9%6.0%
P43
Net-to-Gross30.4%28.4%33.5%38.1%
P33
Occupancy46.8%49.8%60.5%65.9%
P16
Rev/Bed$1.3M$1.2M$1.5M$2.7M
P25
Exp/Bed$1.2M$1.3M$1.7M$2.6M
P20

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML