Corpus Intelligence EBITDA Bridge — MILE BLUFF MEDICAL CENTER INC. 2026-04-26 09:06 UTC
EBITDA Bridge — MILE BLUFF MEDICAL CENTER INC.
CCN 520109 | WI | 40 beds | Current EBITDA $-18.2M → Pro Forma $-13.6M (+$4.6M)
🛡️ Public data only — no PHI permitted on this instance.
$87.9M
Net Revenue HCRIS
$-18.2M
Current EBITDA COMPUTED
+$4.6M
RCM EBITDA Uplift
$-13.6M
Pro Forma EBITDA
+526bps
Margin Improvement
$3.4M
WC Released (1x)

Bridge Realization Estimate

ML model predicts what fraction of the bridge is achievable (accuracy: 60%, n=5,839)

64%
Realization (C)
$4.6M
Modeled Uplift
$2.9M
Risk-Adjusted
-$1.7M
Execution Discount
Occupancy RateLower Occupancy Rate reduces execution likelihood
Revenue per BedHigher Revenue per Bed increases execution likelih
Bed CountHigher Bed Count increases execution likelihood
Commercial Payer %Commercial Payer % has minimal effect on execution
Payer DiversityPayer Diversity has minimal effect on execution

Expected realization: 64% of modeled bridge. Strengths: Revenue per Bed, Bed Count. Risks: Occupancy Rate. Risk-adjusted uplift: $2.9M (vs $4.6M modeled).

EBITDA Bridge — 7 RCM Levers

Each bar shows the annual EBITDA impact at full run-rate. Revenue levers increase top-line; cost levers reduce operating expense; cash acceleration releases working capital. Calibrated to published research bands (Denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR).

Cost to Collect
Cost Savings | 12mo ramp
$1.8M
+200bp
Denial Rate Reduction
Revenue | 12mo ramp
$1.7M
+198bp
A/R Days Reduction
Cash Accel | 9mo ramp
$1.1M
+122bp
Clean Claim Rate
Cost Savings | 6mo ramp
$56K
+6bp
Total EBITDA Impact$4.6M

Lever Detail

Each value shows its data source. SELLER = seller data room, DEFAULT = model default, BENCHMARK = P75 peer benchmark.

LeverCurrentTargetRevenueCostEBITDAWCRamp
Cost to Collect4.5% DEFAULT2.5% BENCHMARK$0$1.8M$1.8M$012mo
Denial Rate Reduction12.0% DEFAULT6.5% BENCHMARK$1.7M$48K$1.7M$012mo
A/R Days Reduction52.00 DEFAULT38.00 BENCHMARK$270K$800K$1.1M$3.4M9mo
Clean Claim Rate88.0% DEFAULT96.0% BENCHMARK$0$56K$56K$06mo
Net Collection Rate93.5% DEFAULT51.2% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo
CDI / Case Mix Index135.0% DEFAULT142.0% BENCHMARK$0$0$0$018mo

Implementation Timing Curve

Linear ramp to full run-rate per lever. Month 0 = close date. Partners should expect 60-70% of total uplift realized by month 12.

LeverM0M3M6M9M12M18M24M36
Cost to Collect$0$440K$879K$1.3M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M$1.8M
Denial Rate Reduction$0$435K$870K$1.3M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M$1.7M
A/R Days Reduction$0$357K$713K$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M$1.1M
Clean Claim Rate$0$28K$56K$56K$56K$56K$56K$56K
Cumulative$0$1.3M$2.5M$3.8M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M$4.6M

Returns Sensitivity (IRR / MOIC)

5-year hold, 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown. Green = exceeds 20% IRR hurdle. Amber = 15-20%. Red = below hurdle or loss. RCM uplift of $4.6M is added at exit.

Entry \ Exit9.0x10.0x11.0x11.5x12.0x
8.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
9.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
10.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
11.0xLossLossLossLossLoss
12.0xLossLossLossLossLoss

Covenant Headroom (at 10x Entry, 6.5x Max Leverage)

99.0x
Entry Leverage
99.0x
Pro Forma Leverage
-92.5x
Headroom (turns)
0%
EBITDA Cushion

Pro forma EBITDA can decline 0% before the 6.5x covenant trips. RCM uplift reduces leverage from 99.0x to 99.0x, adding 0.0 turns of cushion.

5-Year Value Creation Waterfall

EBITDA trajectory: 3% organic growth + RCM uplift ramp (full run-rate at month 18).

Base EBITDARCM UpliftTotalMargin
Entry$-18.2M$-18.2M-20.7%
Year 1$-18.7M+$3.1M$-15.6M-17.8%
Year 2$-19.3M+$4.6M$-14.7M-16.7%
Year 3$-19.9M+$4.6M$-15.2M-17.3%
Year 4$-20.5M+$4.6M$-15.8M-18.0%
Year 5$-21.1M+$4.6M$-16.5M-18.7%
$-181.9M
Entry EV (10x)
$-181.0M
Exit EV (11x)
$830K
Value Created
$-16.5M
Exit EBITDA
$-29.0M
Organic Growth
$46.3M
RCM Value Creation
$-16.5M
Multiple Expansion

Achievement Sensitivity

What if we only achieve a fraction of each lever? 50% = conservative, 75% = base management case, 100% = plan, 120% = stretch.

Lever50%75%100%120%
Cost to Collect$879K$1.3M$1.8M$2.1M
Denial Rate Reductio$870K$1.3M$1.7M$2.1M
A/R Days Reduction$535K$802K$1.1M$1.3M
Clean Claim Rate$28K$42K$56K$68K
Total$2.3M$3.5M$4.6M$5.6M

Peer Context — Where This Hospital Sits

Key metrics vs 90 size-matched peers. Low percentile on margin/efficiency metrics = more room for improvement = larger bridge opportunity.

MetricHospitalP25P50P75Percentile
Op Margin-20.7%-8.1%2.0%8.6%
P13
Net-to-Gross37.6%34.2%43.1%51.2%
P33
Occupancy26.3%28.1%39.6%51.5%
P23
Rev/Bed$2.2M$867K$1.9M$3.0M
P58
Exp/Bed$2.7M$1.0M$1.8M$2.9M
P69

Bridge Methodology

Coefficients calibrated to published research bands: denial 12%→5% = $8-15M on $400M NPR. Current metrics estimated from HCRIS public data and ML predictions. Target metrics set at P75 peer benchmarks with 60% gap closure assumption. Revenue levers use NPR × delta × avoidable share. Cost levers use claims volume × cost per reworked claim. Working capital from AR reduction is one-time cash (not included in recurring EBITDA). Returns assume 5.5x leverage, 3% organic growth, 10%/yr debt paydown.

Data: HCRIS FY2022 | 6,123 hospitalsSources: HCRISML